Does an additional antirotation U-Blade (RC) lag screw improve treatment of AO/OTA 31 A1-3 fractures with gamma 3 nail?
- PMID: 27832831
- DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.10.032
Does an additional antirotation U-Blade (RC) lag screw improve treatment of AO/OTA 31 A1-3 fractures with gamma 3 nail?
Abstract
Introduction: Poor bone quality and unstable fractures increase the cut-out rate in implants with gliding lag screws. The U-Blade (RC) lag screw for the Gamma3® nail was introduced to provide monoaxial rotational stability of the femoral head and neck fragment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the use of the U-Blade (RC) lag screw is associated with reduced cut-out in patients with OTA/AO 31A1-3 fractures.
Material & methods: Between 2009 and 2014, 751 patients with OTA/AO 31A1-3 fractures were treated with a Gamma3® nail at our institution. Out of this sample 199 patients were treated with U-blade (RC) lag screws. A total of 135 patients (117 female, 18 male) with standard lag screw (treatment group A) were matched equally regarding age (±4 years) sex, fracture type and location to 135 patients with U-blade (RC) lag screw (treatment group B). Within a mean follow up of 9.2 months (range 6-18 months) we assessed the cut-out rate, the calTAD, lag screw migration, the Parker's mobility score and the Parker's ratio at postoperatively, six and 12 months following surgery. Furthermore we recorded all complications, ASA-Score, hospital stay and duration of surgery retrospectively.
Results: The most common fracture among group B with a cut-out of the lag screw were AO/OTA 2.3 and 3.2 fractures whereas in group A cut-out was most commonly seen in AO/OTA 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3 fractures, there was no significant reduction of the cut-out rate in group B 2.2% (n=3) compared to group A 3.7% (n=5). The duration of surgery was significantly shorter in group A (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in lag screw placement, the Parker's ratio and mobilization.
Conclusion: In our study the U-Blade (RC) lag screw did not reduce the cut-out in treatment of OTA/AO 31A1-3 fractures at all. Considering the longer duration of surgery and the higher costs of the U-Blade (RC) lag screw, our results do not justify its use. However, further prospective randomized studies will be necessary.
Keywords: AO/OTA 31.A1-3 femur fractures; Cut-out; Gamma3 nail; U-Blade (RC) lag screw.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Migration of the Lag Screw after Intramedullary Treatment of AO/OTA 31.A2.1-3 Pertrochanteric Fractures Does Not Result in Higher Incidence of Cut-Outs, Regardless of Which Implant Was Used: A Comparison of Gamma Nail with and without U-Blade (RC) Lag Screw and Proximal Femur Nail Antirotation (PFNA).J Clin Med. 2019 May 7;8(5):615. doi: 10.3390/jcm8050615. J Clin Med. 2019. PMID: 31067639 Free PMC article.
-
Gamma 3 U-Blade lag screws in patients with trochanteric femur fractures: are rotation control lag screws better than others?J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Dec 16;14(1):440. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1427-z. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019. PMID: 31842911 Free PMC article.
-
Additional use of anti-rotation U-blade (RC) decreases lag screw sliding and limb length inequality in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures.Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 31;11(1):17417. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96988-z. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34465817 Free PMC article.
-
No difference between lag screw and helical blade for cephalomedullary nail cut-out a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022 Dec;32(8):1617-1625. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-03124-8. Epub 2021 Oct 19. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022. PMID: 34665292
-
Radiographic Review of Helical Blade Versus Lag Screw Fixation for Cephalomedullary Nailing of Low-Energy Peritrochanteric Femur Fractures: There is a Difference in Cutout.J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Jun;31(6):305-310. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000853. J Orthop Trauma. 2017. PMID: 28346314 Review.
Cited by
-
Treatment outcomes of concomitant ipsilateral neck and trochanteric fractures using Gamma3 nails with U-blade lag screws.Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2024 Aug 29;58(4):209-214. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2024.23217. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2024. PMID: 39320260 Free PMC article.
-
Cut-out risk factor analysis after intramedullary nailing for the treatment of extracapsular fractures of the proximal femur: a retrospective study.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Feb 1;23(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05054-w. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022. PMID: 35105349 Free PMC article.
-
A Comparison of U-blade Gamma3 and Gamma3 Nails Used for the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures.Hip Pelvis. 2020 Mar;32(1):50-57. doi: 10.5371/hp.2020.32.1.50. Epub 2020 Feb 26. Hip Pelvis. 2020. PMID: 32158729 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Outcomes of U-blade Gamma3 Nails Used to Treat Patients with Trochanteric Fractures: Retrospective Multicenter Study.Hip Pelvis. 2019 Jun;31(2):95-101. doi: 10.5371/hp.2019.31.2.95. Epub 2019 May 30. Hip Pelvis. 2019. PMID: 31198776 Free PMC article.
-
Migration of the Lag Screw after Intramedullary Treatment of AO/OTA 31.A2.1-3 Pertrochanteric Fractures Does Not Result in Higher Incidence of Cut-Outs, Regardless of Which Implant Was Used: A Comparison of Gamma Nail with and without U-Blade (RC) Lag Screw and Proximal Femur Nail Antirotation (PFNA).J Clin Med. 2019 May 7;8(5):615. doi: 10.3390/jcm8050615. J Clin Med. 2019. PMID: 31067639 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical