Flat epithelial atypia on core needle biopsy, must we surgically excise?

Abstract

Breast flat epithelial atypia (FEA) often coexists with more aggressive pathology and excision is currently recommended when diagnosed by core needle biopsy (CNB). Recent studies suggest isolated FEA has a low association with carcinoma and may warrant close surveillance. A radiology database containing 2189 breast CNB was reviewed for isolated FEA or FEA in combination with atypical pathology. 79 patients had FEA. There were 48/79 with isolated FEA and 31/79 concomitant FEA with ADH, ALH, or LCIS. 46 subsequent excisional biopsies of isolated FEA resulted: benign 38/46, ADH 5/46, LCIS 2/46, DCIS 1/46. Concomitant FEA + ADH/ALH/LCIS group resulted: benign 26/31, DCIS 3/31, DCIS and LCIS 1/31, tubular carcinoma 1/31. DCIS/invasive cancer on excision in the FEA + ADH group is 5/31 versus 1/46 for isolated FEA (p 0.0489). Findings support literature suggesting isolated FEA has a low association with carcinoma. These patients may not require surgical excision, but instead have close surveillance. Based on the higher cancer incidence in FEA combined with ADH, ALH, LCIS, or residual microcalcifications, we still recommend surgical excision.

Summary: Breast flat epithelial atypia (FEA) often coexists with more aggressive pathology and surgical excision is currently recommended when diagnosed by core needle biopsy. Recent studies have suggested isolated FEA has a low association with carcinoma and these patients may warrant close surveillance. Isolated FEA has a low association with carcinoma in our series. These patients may not require surgical excision, but instead have close surveillance.

Keywords: Breast; Core needle biopsy; Flat epithelial atypia; Surgical excision.