Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Dec;15(4):425-441.
doi: 10.1007/s12663-015-0766-5. Epub 2015 Apr 19.

Mandibular Reconstruction: Overview

Affiliations
Review

Mandibular Reconstruction: Overview

Batchu Pavan Kumar et al. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Mandibular reconstruction has changed significantly over the years and continues to evolve with the introduction of newer technologies and techniques.

Purpose: This article reviews the history of oromandibular reconstruction, biomechanics of mandible, summarizes the reconstruction options available for mandible with defect classification, goals in reconstruction, the various donor sites, current reconstructive options, dental rehabilitation and persistent associated problems.

Summary: Oromandibular reconstruction, although a challenge for the head and neck reconstructive surgeon, is now reliable and highly successful with excellent long-term functional and aesthetic outcomes with the use of autogenous bone grafts and current reconstructive options. The ideal reconstruction would provide a solid arch to articulate with the upper jaw, restoring swallowing speech, mastication, and esthetics. Autogenous vascularized bone grafts in combination with microsurgical techniques have revolutionized mandibular reconstruction in oral cancer surgery. Current trends in mandibular reconstruction aim to achieve reestablishment of a viable mandible of proper form and maxillary mandibular relationship while decreasing the need for invasive autogenous graft procurement. However the optimal reconstruction of mandibular defects is still controversial in regards to reconstructive options which include the donor site selection, timing of surgery and method of reconstruction.

Keywords: Bone substitutes; Implants; Mandibular reconstruction; Vascularized and non vascularized bone grafts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Basis of the HCL method for classifying mandibular defects

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ivy RH. Bone grafting for restoration of defects of the mandible. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946) 1951;7(4):333–341. doi: 10.1097/00006534-195107040-00009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tessier P, Kawamoto H, Matthews D, Posnick J, Raulo Y, Tulasne JF, Wolfe SA. Taking long rib grafts for facial reconstruction: tools and techniques—III. A 2900-case experience in maxillofacial and craniofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(5 Suppl):38S–46S. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000173906.35257.e0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Testelin S. History of microsurgical reconstruction of the mandible. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1992;37(3):241–245. - PubMed
    1. de Fries HO. Reconstruction of the mandible: use of combined homologous mandible and autologous bone. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1981;89(4):694–697. - PubMed
    1. White S. The employment of silver wire to bridge the gap after resection of a portion of the lower jaw. Br Med J. 1909;2(2552):1525. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.2552.1525. - DOI - PMC - PubMed