Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2016 Nov 8;7(6):e01902-16.
doi: 10.1128/mBio.01902-16.

Rigorous Science: a How-To Guide

Arturo Casadevall  1 , Ferric C Fang  2
Affiliations
Editorial

Rigorous Science: a How-To Guide

Arturo Casadevall et al. mBio. .

Abstract

Proposals to improve the reproducibility of biomedical research have emphasized scientific rigor. Although the word "rigor" is widely used, there has been little specific discussion as to what it means and how it can be achieved. We suggest that scientific rigor combines elements of mathematics, logic, philosophy, and ethics. We propose a framework for rigor that includes redundant experimental design, sound statistical analysis, recognition of error, avoidance of logical fallacies, and intellectual honesty. These elements lead to five actionable recommendations for research education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
A Pentateuch for improving rigor in the biomedical sciences.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Kline M. 1980. Mathematics: the loss of certainty. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
    1. Begley CG, Ellis LM. 2012. Drug development: raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature 483:531–533. doi:10.1038/483531a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Prinz F, Schlange T, Asadullah K. 2011. Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nat Rev Drug Discov 10:712. doi:10.1038/nrd3439-c1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fang FC, Steen RG, Casadevall A. 2012. Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:17028–17033. doi:10.1073/pnas.1212247109. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bik EM, Casadevall A, Fang FC. 2016. The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. mBio 7:e00809-16. doi:10.1128/mBio.00809-16. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources