Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1989 Feb;170(2):545-8.
doi: 10.1148/radiology.170.2.2783495.

Detection and quantification of chronic cerebrovascular disease: comparison of MR imaging, SPECT, and CT

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Detection and quantification of chronic cerebrovascular disease: comparison of MR imaging, SPECT, and CT

M Seiderer et al. Radiology. 1989 Feb.

Abstract

Twenty patients with angiographically proved occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) (19 unilateral, one bilateral) were studied with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, iodine-123 iodoamphetamine (IMP) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), xenon-133 SPECT, and computed tomography (CT). All patients had a history of stroke or prolonged reversible ischemic neurologic deficit for more than 4 weeks. By regions of interest, T1, T2, regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF), and the number and size of the lesions were determined. The data were expressed as interhemispheric ratios (diseased/nondiseased). The highest ratios obtained were for MR imaging (T1, 2.60 +/- 0.42; T2, 1.61 +/- 0.22 [mean +/- standard deviation]) followed by Xe-133 SPECT (0.58 +/- 0.13) and IMP SPECT (0.56 +/- 0.13). Correlation coefficients for MR imaging (1/T1, 1/T2) and IMP SPECT were below .21. The lesion size was greatest on IMP SPECT images, intermediate on MR images, and least on CT scans. However, MR imaging was superior in detection of pathologic areas (detection rates: MR, 100%; IMP SPECT, 91%; CT, 79%). Relaxation times do not correlate with rCBF.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms