Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar;197(3 Pt 2):911-919.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.11.033. Epub 2016 Nov 10.

Surgical Scar Location Preference for Pediatric Kidney and Pelvic Surgery: A Crowdsourced Survey

Affiliations

Surgical Scar Location Preference for Pediatric Kidney and Pelvic Surgery: A Crowdsourced Survey

Michael L Garcia-Roig et al. J Urol. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: The benefits of minimally invasive surgery in pediatric urology, such as reduced length of hospital stay and postoperative pain, are less predictable compared to findings in the adult literature. We evaluated the choices that adult patients make for themselves and their children regarding scar location.

Materials and methods: We surveyed the preference for scar location/size based on surgery for bladder and kidney procedures with additional questions assessing the impact of a hidden incision, length of hospital stay and pain. The survey was posted to Amazon® Mechanical Turk®.

Results: We analyzed a total of 954 completed surveys. Surgical history was reported in 660 surveys (69%) with scar bother reported in 357 (54.2%). For pelvic surgery the initial choice was a Pfannenstiel incision for 434 respondents (45.5%), laparoscopy port incisions for 392 (41.1%) and no preference for incision location for 126 (13.2%). When incisions were illustrated relative to undergarments, 718 respondents (75.3%) chose Pfannenstiel. For kidney surgery 567 respondents (59.4%) initially chose the dorsal lumbotomy incision, 170 (17.8%) chose a flank incision, 105 (11.0%) chose laparoscopy ports and 110 (11.5%) had no preference. Respondents were told that minimally invasive surgery might result in less pain/length of hospital stay and were asked to restate the incision choice. For pelvic surgery 232 of 434 respondents (53.5%) who had chosen Pfannenstiel and 282 of 394 (71.6%) who had chosen laparoscopy remained consistent (p <0.001). For kidney surgery 96 respondents (56.5%) who chose a flank incision, 322 (56.8%) who chose dorsal lumbotomy and 68 (64.2%) who chose laparoscopy remained consistent (p = 0.349). Agreement between the incision choice by respondent as a child and for a child was 82% (κ = 0.69) for pelvic surgery and 84.6% (κ = 0.75) for kidney surgery.

Conclusions: The smallest incision is not always the patient preferred incision, particularly in childhood when pain, length of hospital stay and blood loss may be equivocal among approaches. Discussion of surgical treatment options should include scar length, location and relationship to undergarments.

Keywords: cicatrix; kidney; minimally invasive surgical procedures; surgical wound; urinary bladder.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Editorial Comment.
    Routh JC. Routh JC. J Urol. 2017 Mar;197(3 Pt 2):917-918. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.11.106. Epub 2016 Dec 10. J Urol. 2017. PMID: 27951406 No abstract available.
  • Editorial Comment.
    Jacobson DL, Johnson EK. Jacobson DL, et al. J Urol. 2017 Mar;197(3 Pt 2):917. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.11.105. Epub 2016 Dec 10. J Urol. 2017. PMID: 27951407 No abstract available.
  • Editorial Comment.
    Ghani KR. Ghani KR. J Urol. 2017 Mar;197(3 Pt 2):918. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.11.107. Epub 2016 Dec 10. J Urol. 2017. PMID: 27951408 No abstract available.