Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Oct 28:3:96.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00096. eCollection 2016.

Using Scent Detection Dogs in Conservation Settings: A Review of Scientific Literature Regarding Their Selection

Sarah C Beebe  1 , Tiffani J Howell  1 , Pauleen C Bennett  1
Affiliations
Review

Using Scent Detection Dogs in Conservation Settings: A Review of Scientific Literature Regarding Their Selection

Sarah C Beebe et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

Dogs are widely used for scent detection work, assisting in searches for, among other things, missing persons, explosives, and even cancers. They are also increasingly used in conservation settings, being deployed for a range of diverse purposes. Although scent detecting dogs have been used in conservation roles for over 100 years, it is only recently that the scientific literature has begun to document their effectiveness and, importantly, how suitable dogs should initially be selected by organizations wanting to develop a detection program. In this paper, we review this literature, with the aim of extracting information that might be of value to conservation groups considering whether to invest in the use of dogs. We conclude that selection of appropriate dogs is no easy task. While olfactory ability is critical, so also are a range of other characteristics. These include biological, psychological, and social traits. At present, no validated selection tools have been published. Existing organizations have adapted selection instruments from other contexts for their use, but very little published information is available regarding the effectiveness of these instruments in a conservation setting. In the absence of clear guidelines, we urge those wanting to invest in one or more dogs for conservation purposes to proceed with extreme caution and, preferably, under the watchful eyes of an experienced professional.

Keywords: biopsychosocial; conservation; detection dog; olfaction; scat; scent; selection; wildlife.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Robert M, Laporte P. Field techniques for studying breeding Yellow Rails. J Field Ornithol (1994) 68(1):56–63.
    1. Helton WS. Introduction to the new science of working dogs. In: Helton WS, editor. Canine Ergonomics: The Science of Working Dogs. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; (2009). p. 1–15.
    1. Jenkins D, Watson A, Miller GR. Population studies on red grouse, Lagopus lagopus scoticus (Lath.) in north-east Scotland. J Anim Ecol (1963) 32(3):317–76.10.2307/2598 - DOI
    1. Dahlgren DK, Elmore RD, Smith DA, Hurt A, Arnett EB, Connelly JW. Use of dogs in wildlife research and management. 7th ed In: Silvy NJ, editor. The Wildlife Techniques Manual Volume 1. Baltimore, ML: The John Hopkins University Press; (2012). p. 140–53.
    1. Gutzwiller K. Minimizing dog-induced biases in game bird research. Wildl Soc Bull (1990) 18(3):351–6.

LinkOut - more resources