Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec;23(1):11-19.
doi: 10.1080/13814788.2016.1240166. Epub 2016 Nov 14.

The readiness of German GPs to recommend and conduct cancer screening is associated with patient-physician gender concordance. Results of a survey

Jennifer Engler  1 , Anne Dahlhaus  1   2   3 , Corina Güthlin  1
Affiliations

The readiness of German GPs to recommend and conduct cancer screening is associated with patient-physician gender concordance. Results of a survey

Jennifer Engler et al. Eur J Gen Pract. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Cancer screening participation rates in Germany differ depending on patients' gender. International studies have found that patient-physician gender concordance fosters recommendation and conducting of cancer screening, and especially cancer screening for women.

Objectives: We aimed to ascertain whether gender concordance influences general practitioners' (GPs') rating of the usefulness of cancer screening, as well as their recommendations and readiness to conduct cancer screening in general practice in Germany.

Methods: For an exploratory cross-sectional survey, 500 randomly selected GPs from all over Germany were asked to fill in a questionnaire on cancer screening in general practice between March and June 2015. We asked them to rate the usefulness of each cancer screening examination, how frequently they recommended and conducted them and whether they viewed GPs or specialists as responsible for carrying them out. We used multiple logistic regression to analyse gender effect size by calculating odds ratios.

Results: Our study sample consisted of 139 GPs of which 65% were male. Male and female GPs did not differ significantly in their rating of the general usefulness of any of the specified cancer screening examinations. Male GPs were 2.9 to 6.8 times as likely to consider GPs responsible for recommending and conducting PSA testing and digital rectal examinations and were 3.7 to 7.9 times as likely to recommend and conduct these examinations on a regular basis.

Conclusion: Patient-physician gender concordance made it more likely that male-specific cancer screenings would be recommended and conducted, but not female-specific screenings. [Box: see text].

Keywords: General practice/family medicine; cancer screening; gender; oncology; survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Gender differences in percentage of GPs who rate the cancer screening examination in question as useful or fairly useful, tested by applying the chi-square statistic. *More than 20% of cells in this table have expected cell counts of less than five. Chi-square results may be invalid.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Prasad V, Lenzer J, Newman DH.. Why cancer screening has never been shown to “save lives”—and what we can do about it. BMJ. 2016:h6080. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6080. - DOI - PubMed
    1. European Commission, Directorate-General for Health and Consumers, World Health Organisation, CHAFEA—Consumers, Health and Food Executive Agency, Karsa L von, Segnan N, et al. . European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First ed. Luxembourg: European Commission, Publications Office of the European Union; 2010. [cited 2016 Jul 23]. Available from: http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/european-guidelines-for-quality-assurance-i....
    1. European Commission, Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety, Arbyn M, Antilla A, Jordan J.. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening. Second ed. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2008. [cited 2016 Jul 23]. Available from: http://bookshop.europa.eu/de/european-guidelines-for-quality-assurance-i....
    1. European Commission, Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety, Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, et al. . European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth ed. supplements. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2013. [cited 2016 Jul 23]. Available from: http://bookshop.europa.eu/de/european-guidelines-for-quality-assurance-i....
    1. Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss Krebsfrüherkennungsrichtlinie [Guideline on the early detection of cancer]. 2015. [cited 2016 Jul 25]. Available from: https://www.g-ba.de/downloads/62-492-1205/KFE-RL_2015-10-15_iK-2016-07-0....