Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2016 May;130(S2):S191-S197.
doi: 10.1017/S0022215116000621.

Reconstructive considerations in head and neck surgical oncology: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines

Affiliations
Practice Guideline

Reconstructive considerations in head and neck surgical oncology: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines

M Ragbir et al. J Laryngol Otol. 2016 May.

Abstract

This is the official guideline endorsed by the specialty associations involved in the care of head and neck cancer patients in the UK. The reconstructive needs following ablative surgery for head and neck cancer are unique and require close attention to both form and function. The vast experience accrued with microvascular reconstructive surgery has meant a significant expansion in the options available. This paper discusses the options for reconstruction available following ablative surgery for head and neck cancer and offers recommendations for reconstruction in the various settings. Recommendations • Microsurgical free flap reconstruction should be the primary reconstructive option for most defects of the head and neck that need tissue transfer. (R) • Free flaps should be offered as first choice of reconstruction for all patients needing circumferential pharyngoesophageal reconstruction. (R) • Free flap reconstruction should be offered for patients with class III or higher defects of the maxilla. (R) • Composite free tissue transfer should be offered as first choice to all patients needing mandibular reconstruction. (R) • Patients undergoing salvage total laryngectomy should be offered vascularised flap reconstruction to reduce pharyngocutaneous fistula rates. (R).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Classification of mandibular defects.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Classification of the maxillary and midface defects. Classes I–VI relate to the vertical component of the defect including orbitomaxillary (class V) and nasomaxillary (class VI) when often the palate and dental alveolus are intact. Classes a–d relate to the increasing size of the palatal and dento-alveolar part of the defect indicating increasing difficulty in obtaining good results with obturation.

References

    1. Hanasono MM, Matros E, Disa JJ. Important aspects of head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;134:968e–80e - PubMed
    1. Cannady SB, Lamarre E, Wax MK. Microvascular reconstruction: evidence-based procedures. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2015;23:347–56 - PubMed
    1. Soutar DS, McGregor IA. The radial forearm flap in intraoral reconstruction: the experience of 60 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;78:1–8 - PubMed
    1. Chana JS, Wei FC. A review of the advantages of the anterolateral thigh flap in head and neck reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 2004;57:603–9 - PubMed
    1. Markiewicz MR, Bell RB, Bui TG, Dierks EJ, Ruiz R, Gelesko S et al. Survival of microvascular free flaps in mandibular reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microsurgery 2015;35:576–87 - PubMed

Publication types