Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 14;16(1):1158.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3808-0.

A qualitative study of user perceptions of mobile health apps

Wei Peng  1 , Shaheen Kanthawala  2 , Shupei Yuan  3 , Syed Ali Hussain  4
Affiliations

A qualitative study of user perceptions of mobile health apps

Wei Peng et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Mobile apps for health exist in large numbers today, but oftentimes, consumers do not continue to use them after a brief period of initial usage, are averse toward using them at all, or are unaware that such apps even exist. The purpose of our study was to examine and qualitatively determine the design and content elements of health apps that facilitate or impede usage from the users' perceptive.

Methods: In 2014, six focus groups and five individual interviews were conducted in the Midwest region of the U.S. with a mixture of 44 smartphone owners of various social economic status. The participants were asked about their general and health specific mobile app usage. They were then shown specific features of exemplar health apps and prompted to discuss their perceptions. The focus groups and interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded using the software NVivo.

Results: Inductive thematic analysis was adopted to analyze the data and nine themes were identified: 1) barriers to adoption of health apps, 2) barriers to continued use of health apps, 3) motivators, 4) information and personalized guidance, 5) tracking for awareness and progress, 6) credibility, 7) goal setting, 8) reminders, and 9) sharing personal information. The themes were mapped to theories for interpretation of the results.

Conclusions: This qualitative research with a diverse pool of participants extended previous research on challenges and opportunities of health apps. The findings provide researchers, app designers, and health care providers insights on how to develop and evaluate health apps from the users' perspective.

Keywords: Adoption; Health promotion; Mobile apps; Qualitative study; Self-regulation; Smartphone; Technology acceptance; User perception; mHealth.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Becker S, Miron-Shatz T, Schumacher N, Krocza J, Diamantidis C, Albrecht U-V. mHealth 2.0: Experiences, possibilities, and perspectives. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2014;2:e24. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3328. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boulos MN, Brewer AC, Karimkhani C, Buller DB, Dellavalle RP. Mobile medical and health apps: state of the art, concerns, regulatory control and certification. Online J Public Health Inform. 2014;5:229. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cafazzo JA, Casselman M, Hamming N, Katzman DK, Palmert MR. Design of an mHealth app for the self-management of adolescent type 1 diabetes: a pilot study. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14:e70. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2058. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kirwan M, Vandelanotte C, Fenning A, Duncan MJ. Diabetes self-management smartphone application for adults with Type 1 diabetes: Randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15:e235. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2588. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stinson JN, Jibb LA, Nguyen C, Nathan PC, Maloney AM, Dupuis LL, et al. Development and testing of a multidimensional iPhone pain assessment application for adolescents with cancer. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15:e51. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2350. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources