Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 Oct 1;13(Fall):1e.
eCollection 2016 fall.

Implementation and Impact of Psychiatric Electronic Medical Records in a Public Medical Center

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Implementation and Impact of Psychiatric Electronic Medical Records in a Public Medical Center

Anna Q Xiao et al. Perspect Health Inf Manag. .

Abstract

Objectives: This study describes the efforts to implement electronic charting in a large public psychiatric outpatient clinic with the objective to improve clinical documentation.

Methods: Data made available through the quality review process are utilized to evaluate the effectiveness of the electronic intervention. The study is a comparative analysis of the three years before and three years after the point of implementation of electronic charting.

Results: Statistical analyses indicate significant findings (p <.0001) in the comparison of the periods before and after implementation in terms of note completion and documentation of medication management, supporting the study's hypothesis that electronic intervention will improve the quality of clinical documentation.

Conclusions: This study contributes new knowledge to improve our understanding of the barriers and benefits of implementing and maintaining electronic charting in mental health settings.

Keywords: electronic charting; electronic medical records; psychiatric electronic medical records; quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trend Analysis of Intake Evaluation Notes after Implementation of Electronic Medical Records Notes: Generalized linear modeling was employed. In the period after implementation, items 1, 2, and 3 were all significant at p <.0001. Items shown in this graph are as follows: Item 1: The intake evaluation progress note documenting the completion of the intake evaluation was completed and co-signed by supervisors. Item 2: The provider's and supervisor's names are listed in the signature section of the progress note in the electronic chart. Item 3: The service procedure code, the face-to-face time, and total time used for intake are listed.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jha A.K., DesRoches C.M., Campbell E.G., Donelan K., Sowmya R.R., Ferris T.G., Shields A., Rosenbaum S., Blumenthal. D. Use of Electronic Health Records in U.S. Hospitals. New England Journal of Medicine. 2009;360:1628–1638. - PubMed
    1. DesRoches C.M., Campbell E.G., Rao S.R., Donelan K., Ferris T.G., Jha A., Kaushal R., Levy D.E., Rosenbaum S., Shields A.E., Blumenthal. D. Electronic Health Records in Ambulatory Care—a National Survey of Physicians. New England Journal of Medicine. 2008;359:50–60. - PubMed
    1. Charles D., Furukawa M., Hufstader M.Electronic Health Record Systems and Intent to Attest to Meaningful Use among Non-federal Acute Care Hospitals in the United States: 2008–2011 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) Data Brief No. 1. February 2012. Available at http://www.healthit.gov/media/pdf/ONC_Data_Brief_AHA_2011.pdf (accessed December 11, 2015).
    1. Meigs S., Solomon M. Electronic Health Record Use a Bitter Pill for Many Physicians. Perspectives in Health Information Management. Winter 2016:1–17. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kokkonen E., Davids S.A., Lin H.C., Dabade T.S., Feldman S.R., Fleischer Jr A.B. Use of Electronic Medical Records Differs by Specialty and Office Settings. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2013;20:e33–e38. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources