Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct 7:10:546-552.
doi: 10.2174/1874210601610010546. eCollection 2016.

Influence of Operator's Experience on the Shaping Ability of Protaper Universal and Waveone Systems: A Comparative Study on Simulated Root Canals

Affiliations

Influence of Operator's Experience on the Shaping Ability of Protaper Universal and Waveone Systems: A Comparative Study on Simulated Root Canals

Giuseppe Troiano et al. Open Dent J. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the influence of operator experience on: shaping and centering ability, mean preparation time and presence of canal aberrations of ProTaper Universal and WaveOne systems on simulated root canals.

Materials and methods: Sixty S-shaped canals in resin blocks were assigned to four groups (n=15 for each group). Group1 (Experienced operator, ProTaper), Group2 (Experienced operator, WaveOne), Group3 (Inexperienced operator, ProTaper), Group4 (Inexperienced operator, WaveOne). Photographic method was used to record pre- and post-instrumentations images. After superimposition, it has been evaluated presence of canal aberrations and differences in shaping and centering ability between groups.

Results: WaveOne system produced a lower amount of canal aberrations both in the hand of expert than inexpert operators. However, a WaveOne instrument breakage occurred in the hands of an inexperienced operator. No differences have been found in the evaluation of shaping ability with both systematics. Operator's experience doesn't influence the shaping ability of ProTaper and WaveOne systems.

Conclusion: Experience factor could influence the centering ability in the use of both the systematics. However, WaveOne Primary reduce the mean preparation time and the presence of canal aberrations.

Keywords: Centering ability; Endodontic; ProTaper; Reciprocating; Shaping ability; WaveOne.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. (1)
Fig. (1)
Positions of measurement have been detected by nine concentric circles with center in the apex.
Fig. (2)
Fig. (2)
Total amount of resin removed in S-shaped canals.
Fig. (3)
Fig. (3)
Centering ability in the four groups. (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).

References

    1. Thompson S.A., Dummer P.M. Shaping ability of ProFile.04 Taper Series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2. Int. Endod. J. 1997;30(1):8–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1997.tb01092.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ounsi H.F., Franciosi G., Paragliola R., Al-Hezaimi K., Salameh Z., Tay F.R., Ferrari M., Grandini S. Comparison of two techniques for assessing the shaping efficacy of repeatedly used nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J. Endod. 2011;37(6):847–850. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.030. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peters O.A. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J. Endod. 2004;30(8):559–567. doi: 10.1097/01.DON.0000129039.59003.9D. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berutti E., Paolino D.S., Chiandussi G., Alovisi M., Cantatore G., Castellucci A., Pasqualini D. Root canal anatomy preservation of WaveOne reciprocating files with or without glide path. J. Endod. 2012;38(1):101–104. - PubMed
    1. Bergmans L., Van Cleynenbreugel J., Beullens M., Wevers M., Van Meerbeek B., Lambrechts P. Progressive versus constant tapered shaft design using NiTi rotary instruments. Int. Endod. J. 2003;36(4):288–295. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00650.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources