Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 15;11(11):e0165908.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165908. eCollection 2016.

A Large-Scale Initiative Inviting Patients to Share Personal Fitness Tracker Data with Their Providers: Initial Results

Joshua M Pevnick  1   2 , Garth Fuller  3 , Ray Duncan  2 , Brennan M R Spiegel  3
Affiliations

A Large-Scale Initiative Inviting Patients to Share Personal Fitness Tracker Data with Their Providers: Initial Results

Joshua M Pevnick et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Personal fitness trackers (PFT) have substantial potential to improve healthcare.

Objective: To quantify and characterize early adopters who shared their PFT data with providers.

Methods: We used bivariate statistics and logistic regression to compare patients who shared any PFT data vs. patients who did not.

Results: A patient portal was used to invite 79,953 registered portal users to share their data. Of 66,105 users included in our analysis, 499 (0.8%) uploaded data during an initial 37-day study period. Bivariate and regression analysis showed that early adopters were more likely than non-adopters to be younger, male, white, health system employees, and to have higher BMIs. Neither comorbidities nor utilization predicted adoption.

Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that patients had little intrinsic desire to share PFT data with their providers, and suggest that patients most at risk for poor health outcomes are least likely to share PFT data. Marketing, incentives, and/or cultural change may be needed to induce such data-sharing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Pew Research Center, April, 2015, “The Smartphone Difference” Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/us-smartphone-use-in-2015/ Accessed February 25, 2016.
    1. Patel MS, Asch DA, Volpp KG. Wearable Devices as Facilitators, Not Drivers, of Health Behavior Change. JAMA. 2015;313(5):459–460. 10.1001/jama.2014.14781 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shaw RJ, Steinberg DM, Bonnet J, et al. Mobile health devices: will patients actually use them? Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2016. 10.1093/jamia/ocv186 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Xu X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 2012;36(1):157–78
    1. Ancker JS, Barrón Y, Rockoff ML, et al. Use of an Electronic Patient Portal Among Disadvantaged Populations. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2011;26(10):1117–1123. 10.1007/s11606-011-1749-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed