The design of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the (cost-) effectiveness of the posterolateral versus the direct anterior approach for THA (POLADA - trial)
- PMID: 27846875
- PMCID: PMC5111237
- DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-1322-2
The design of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the (cost-) effectiveness of the posterolateral versus the direct anterior approach for THA (POLADA - trial)
Abstract
Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful orthopaedic procedures. Because of the increasing number of THAs, a growing demand for faster recovery and a greater emphasis on cost-effectiveness, minimally invasive THAs have been introduced in the last decades. The direct anterior approach is a minimally invasive, tissue-sparing approach in which intermuscular planes are used. Theoretically, this approach should result in a faster recovery of physical functioning and higher health-related quality of life.
Methods/design: A randomised controlled trial will be performed. Patients will be randomly allocated to undergo THA by means of the anterior or posterolateral approach. Both the intervention and control group will consist of two subgroups: 1) patients with a good bone stock who will receive an uncemented femoral stem, and 2) patients with a poor bone stock who will receive a cemented femoral stem. Patients between 18 and 90 years with primary or secondary osteoarthritis will be included. Physical functioning and health-related quality of life will be assessed by means of questionnaires. Additionally, performance based tests will be performed to objectively assess the physical functioning. Cost-effectiveness will be assessed by obtaining data on medical costs in and outside the hospital and other nonmedical costs. Measurements will take place preoperatively, two and six weeks, three months and one year postoperatively.
Discussion: There is some evidence that the anterior approach results in reduced tissue damage and faster recovery in the direct postoperative period, compared to the posterolateral approach. However, there is still a lack of well-designed studies that have confirmed the better outcomes and cost-effectiveness of the anterior approach. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess the physical functioning, health related quality of life and the cost-effectiveness of the anterior approach, compared to the conventional posterolateral approach.
Trial registration: Netherlands Trial Registry, number 5343 (registration date April 12, 2015).
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness of computer-navigated minimally invasive total hip surgery compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 Jan 11;8:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-4. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007. PMID: 17214906 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Does Surgical Approach Affect Patient-reported Function After Primary THA?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Apr;474(4):971-81. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4639-5. Epub 2015 Nov 30. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016. PMID: 26620966 Free PMC article.
-
Curved versus Straight Stem Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty Osteoarthritis Multicenter trial (CUSTOM): design of a prospective blinded randomised controlled multicentre trial.BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 23;6(3):e010472. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010472. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 27009147 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The operation of the century: total hip replacement.Lancet. 2007 Oct 27;370(9597):1508-19. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7. Lancet. 2007. PMID: 17964352 Review.
-
Total hip arthroplasty: minimally invasive surgery or not? Meta-analysis of clinical trials.Int Orthop. 2019 Jul;43(7):1573-1582. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4124-3. Epub 2018 Aug 31. Int Orthop. 2019. PMID: 30171273 Review.
Cited by
-
Enhancing recovery: surgical techniques and rehabilitation strategies after direct anterior hip arthroplasty.J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 Sep 30;25(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00786-y. J Orthop Traumatol. 2024. PMID: 39349698 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Approaches for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.Cureus. 2023 Feb 10;15(2):e34829. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34829. eCollection 2023 Feb. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 36919077 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Case report: A 3-year follow-up study of simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty for Femoral head necrosis in a patient with Kashin-Beck Disease.Front Surg. 2022 Aug 8;9:978697. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.978697. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 36003279 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of rehabilitation after a total hip arthroplasty: a protocol for an observational study for the comparison of usual care in the Netherlands versus Germany.BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 11;7(8):e016020. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016020. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28801413 Free PMC article.
-
A prospective randomized comparison of the minimally invasive direct anterior and the transgluteal approach for primary total hip arthroplasty.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jul 19;19(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2133-4. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018. PMID: 30025519 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous