Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May;46(4):468-477.
doi: 10.1007/s13280-016-0849-7. Epub 2016 Nov 15.

Can greening of aquaculture sequester blue carbon?

Affiliations

Can greening of aquaculture sequester blue carbon?

Nesar Ahmed et al. Ambio. 2017 May.

Abstract

Globally, blue carbon (i.e., carbon in coastal and marine ecosystems) emissions have been seriously augmented due to the devastating effects of anthropogenic pressures on coastal ecosystems including mangrove swamps, salt marshes, and seagrass meadows. The greening of aquaculture, however, including an ecosystem approach to Integrated Aquaculture-Agriculture (IAA) and Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) could play a significant role in reversing this trend, enhancing coastal ecosystems, and sequestering blue carbon. Ponds within IAA farming systems sequester more carbon per unit area than conventional fish ponds, natural lakes, and inland seas. The translocation of shrimp culture from mangrove swamps to offshore IMTA could reduce mangrove loss, reverse blue carbon emissions, and in turn increase storage of blue carbon through restoration of mangroves. Moreover, offshore IMTA may create a barrier to trawl fishing which in turn could help restore seagrasses and further enhance blue carbon sequestration. Seaweed and shellfish culture within IMTA could also help to sequester more blue carbon. The greening of aquaculture could face several challenges that need to be addressed in order to realize substantial benefits from enhanced blue carbon sequestration and eventually contribute to global climate change mitigation.

Keywords: Aquaculture; Blue carbon; Climate change; Coastal ecosystems; Mitigation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Blue carbon emissions from coastal ecosystems with potential for blue carbon sequestration through the greening of aquaculture

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adhikari S, Lal R, Sahu BC. Carbon sequestration in the bottom sediments of aquaculture ponds of Orissa, India. Ecological Engineering. 2012;47:198–202. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.06.007. - DOI
    1. Ahmed N, Toufique KA. Greening the blue revolution of small-scale freshwater aquaculture in Mymensingh, Bangladesh. Aquaculture Research. 2015;46:2305–2322. doi: 10.1111/are.12390. - DOI
    1. Ahmed N, Glaser M. Coastal aquaculture, mangrove deforestation and blue carbon emissions: Is REDD+ a solution? Marine Policy. 2016;66:58–66. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.01.011. - DOI
    1. Ahmed N, Ward JD, Saint CP. Can integrated aquaculture–agriculture (IAA) produce “more crop per drop”? Food Security. 2014;6:767–779. doi: 10.1007/s12571-014-0394-9. - DOI
    1. Alongi DM. Mangrove forests: Resilience, protection from tsunamis, and responses to global climate change. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2008;76:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2007.08.024. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources