Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 15:6:32793.
doi: 10.3402/iee.v6.32793. eCollection 2016.

Individual and environmental factors associated with the seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi in Belgian farmers and veterinarians

Mathilde De Keukeleire  1   2 , Annie Robert  3 , Benoît Kabamba  4 , Elise Dion  5 , Victor Luyasu  3 , Sophie O Vanwambeke  1
Affiliations

Individual and environmental factors associated with the seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi in Belgian farmers and veterinarians

Mathilde De Keukeleire et al. Infect Ecol Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Background: Lyme disease (LD) is a common tick-borne disease in Europe. Diverse factors at various scales determine the spatial distribution of Borrelia burgdorferi infection risk and a better understanding of those factors in a spatially explicit framework is needed for disease management and prevention. While the ecology of ticks and the landscape favoring their abundance have been extensively studied, the environmental conditions favoring an intense contact with susceptible humans, including groups at risk, are sparse. The aim of this study is to assess which individual and environmental factors can favor B. burgdorferi infection in a Belgian group professionally at risk.

Methods: Serological results of 127 veterinarians and farmers enrolled in this study were analyzed, taking into account their municipality of residence. Using binary logistic regression and considering interaction terms, the joint effects of landscape composition and configuration, and forest and wildlife management were examined.

Results: Seven of the 127 workers were seropositive for LD, leading to a seroprevalence of 5.51%. Seropositivity was higher in older persons. The proportion of forest and semi-natural habitats and wetland had a positive impact on LD seroprevalence while arable land-grassland ecotones had a negative one. Our results confirmed the need to consider complex interactions between landscape variables in order to model risk.

Conclusions: Our data show that LD has to be considered as a risk for farmers and veterinarians. Rather than focusing either on ecological aspects of tick and pathogen distribution or on purely epidemiological aspects such as individual risk factors, our model highlights the role of human-environment interactions in LD risk assessment.

Keywords: B. burgdorferi infection; Belgium; Lyme disease; risk assessment; spatial modeling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest and fundingNo competing financial interests exist. This study was kindly supported by Special Research Fund (FSR) grants of the Université catholique de Louvain.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Location of participants and serological results for Borrelia burgdorferi infections.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Total effects of the proportion of forest and semi-natural habitats, the proportion of wetland, and the edge proportion grassland–arable land on the presence or absence of Borrelia infection (without mediation) (a) and the impact of the proportion of forest and semi-natural habitats on the presence or absence of Borrelia infection (b).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Boxplots of logit risk scores derived from the estimated equation in all participants, regardless of professions (a), in farmers (b), and in veterinarians (c).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
ROC curve.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Borrelia serology results of the 11 participants notifying a history of Lyme disease.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bigaignon G, Tomasi JP, Goubau P, Martin P, Pierard D, Sindic CJ, et al. A clinical and sero-epidemiological study of 190 Belgian patients suffering from Lyme borreliosis. Acta Clin Belg. 1989;44:174–81. - PubMed
    1. Borchers AT, Keen CL, Huntley AC, Gershwin ME. Lyme disease: a rigorous review of diagnostic criteria and treatment. J Autoimmun. 2015;57:82–115. - PubMed
    1. Lindgren E, Jaenson TGT. Lyme borreliosis in Europe: influences of climate and climate change, epidemiology, ecology and adaptation measures. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2006. EUR/04/5046250.
    1. De Keukeleire M, Vanwambeke SO, Somassè E, Kabamba B, Luyasu V, Robert A. Scouts, forests, and ticks: impact of landscapes on human-tick contacts. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2015;6:636–44. - PubMed
    1. Lakos A, Igari Z, Solymosi N. Recent lesson from a clinical and seroepidemiological survey: low positive predictive value of Borrelia burgdorferi antibody testing in a high risk population. Adv Med Sci. 2012;57:356–63. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources