Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2017 Mar;102(2):F104-F109.
doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-310723. Epub 2016 Nov 15.

Short-term outcome of treatment limitation discussions for newborn infants, a multicentre prospective observational cohort study

Collaborators, Affiliations
Observational Study

Short-term outcome of treatment limitation discussions for newborn infants, a multicentre prospective observational cohort study

Narendra Aladangady et al. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the short-term outcomes of babies for whom clinicians or parents discussed the limitation of life-sustaining treatment (LST).

Design: Prospective multicentre observational study.

Setting: Two level 3, six level 2 and one level 1 neonatal units in the North-East London Neonatal Network.

Participants: A total of 87 babies including 68 for whom limiting LST was discussed with parents and 19 babies died without discussion of limiting LST in the labour ward or neonatal unit.

Outcome measures: Final decision reached after discussions about limiting LST and neonatal unit outcomes (death or survived to discharge) for babies.

Results: Withdrawing LST, withholding LST and do not resuscitate (DNR) order was discussed with 48, 16 and 4 parents, respectively. In 49/68 (72%) cases decisions occurred in level 3 and 19 cases in level 2 units. Following the initial discussions, 34/68 parents made the decision to continue LST. In 33/68 cases, a second opinion was obtained. The parents of 14/48 and 2/16 babies did not agree to withdraw and withhold LST, respectively. Forty-seven out of 87 babies (54%) died following limitation of LST, 28/87 (32%) died receiving full intensive care support, 5/87 (6%) survived following a decision to limit LST and 7/87 (8%) babies survived following decision to continue LST.

Conclusions: A significant proportion of parents chose to continue treatment following discussions regarding limiting LST for their babies, and a proportion of these babies survived to neonatal unit discharge. The long-term outcomes of babies who survive following limiting LST discussion need to be investigated.

Keywords: DNR Order; Limitation of life sustaining treatment; Neonatal death; Newborn baby; Withdrawal of life sustaining treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources