Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov;41(6):494-500.

High Flow Nasal Cannulae versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Neonates with Respiratory Distress Syndrome Managed with INSURE Method: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations

High Flow Nasal Cannulae versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Neonates with Respiratory Distress Syndrome Managed with INSURE Method: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Maliheh Kadivar Md et al. Iran J Med Sci. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Background: In recent years, various noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) of ventilation has been provided more in neonates. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of HFNC with NCPAP in post-extubation of preterm infants with RDS after INSURE method (intubation, surfactant, extubation).

Methods: A total of 54 preterm infants with RDS (respiratory distress syndrome) were enrolled in this study. Using a randomized sequence, they were assigned into two groups after INSURE method. The first group received HFNC while the second group received NCPAP for respiratory support after extubation. A comparison was made between these two groups by the rate of reintubation, air leak syndrome, duration of oxygen therapy, hospitalization, the rate of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), and mortality. Data were analyzed by using the SPSS version 18 software. The statistical analyses included Student's t-test for continuous data and compared proportions using Chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test for categorical data.

Result: The rate of reintubation was higher in the HFNC compared with the NCPAP group. The rate of either IVH or ROP had no significant differences between the two groups. In addition, duration of oxygen requirement and hospitalization were not statistically different. There was no case of BPD or mortality among these patients.

Conclusion: This study showed that preterm infants with RDS could manage post-extubation after INSURE method with either NCPAP or HFNC. However, in this single-center study, the rate of reintubation was higher in the HFNC group while further multicenter study might be assigned. Trial Registration Number: IRCT201201228800N1.

Keywords: Oxygen inhalation therapy infant-newborn; Premature birth; Pulmonary surfactants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participants’ CONSORT flow diagram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. LeVan JM, Brion LP, Wrage LA, Gantz MG, Wyckoff MH, Sanchez PJ, et al. Change in practice after the Surfactant, Positive Pressure and Oxygenation Randomised Trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014;99:F386–90. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306057. [ PMC Free Article] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dani C, Corsini I, Bertini G, Fontanelli G, Pratesi S, Rubaltelli FF. The INSURE method in preterm infants of less than 30 weeks’gestation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23:1024–9. doi: 10.3109/14767050903572174. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Collins CL, Holberton JR, Barfield C, Davis PG. A randomized controlled trial to compare heated humidified high-flow nasal cannulae with nasal continuous positive airway pressure postextubation in premature infants. J Pediatr. 2013;162:949–54 e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.11.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ramanathan R. Nasal respiratory support through the nares: its time has come. J Perinatol. 2010;30(Suppl):S67–72. doi: 10.1038/jp.2010.99. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kubicka ZJ, Limauro J, Darnall RA. Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula therapy: yet another way to deliver continuous positive airway pressure? Pediatrics. 2008;121:82–8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0957. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources