Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Hand-Wrist and Cervical Vertebrae Radiography for the Determination of Skeletal Age
- PMID: 27853487
- PMCID: PMC5106762
- DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.21695
Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Hand-Wrist and Cervical Vertebrae Radiography for the Determination of Skeletal Age
Abstract
Background: Prediction of skeletal growth is necessary for growth modification and surgical orthodontic treatments and is usually done by assessing skeletal maturity indicators in hand-wrist radiographs. The use of growth stages of cervical vertebrae in lateral cephalograms has been suggested to avoid overexposure.
Objectives: This study seeks to assess the degree of agreement between hand-wrist and cervical vertebrae maturation stages for skeletal age determination and prediction of the peak growth spurt (PGS).
Patients and methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted with 67 boys and 66 girls between 8 and 18 years of age, divided into 11 age groups; 266 hand-wrist radiographs and lateral cephalograms were obtained and analyzed. Hand-wrist maturation stages were evaluated according to the Grave and Brown, Bjork system (stages 1 - 9). The cervical vertebral maturation stage (CVMS) was determined on lateral cephalograms based on a system described by Baccetti et al. (CVMS 1-5). To apply the Cohen's kappa index, the stages of growth were reduced to 5 intervals (A - E) to relate the 5 CVMS to the 9 stages of Bjork hand-wrist analysis.
Results: In all age groups, the skeletal maturity stages of the hand and wrist bones and the cervical vertebrae of the girls were ahead of the boys. Cohen's kappa test revealed a low level of agreement between the two methods [Kappa (95% CI) = 0.312 (0.290 - 0.377)]; concordance was slightly higher in males (K = 0.33 for males versus 0.27 for females). Evaluation of concordance coefficients between the stages determined by the two methods indicated the highest concordance in 8- and 9-year-olds and the lowest in 12- and 14-year-olds. The level of agreement between the two methods was only acceptable in 8- and 9-year-olds of both genders and 10-year-old boys. The level of agreement between the two methods in other age groups was not acceptable.
Conclusion: The level of agreement between the two methods was low; thus, they cannot be used alternatively to estimate patients' skeletal age or to predict the PGS. This may be due to the effect of different maturation levels (influenced by the environment, ethnicity, and gender) on the agreement between methods for skeletal age determination.
Keywords: Cervical Vertebrae; Growth; Hand; Skeletal Age; Wrist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Radiographic assessment of skeletal maturation stages for orthodontic patients: hand-wrist bones or cervical vertebrae?J Formos Med Assoc. 2008 Apr;107(4):316-25. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(08)60093-5. J Formos Med Assoc. 2008. PMID: 18445546
-
Growth indicators in orthodontic patients. Part 1: comparison of cervical vertebral maturation and hand-wrist skeletal maturation.Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2010 Dec;11(4):171-5. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2010. PMID: 21250766
-
A comparison of hand-wrist bone and cervical vertebral analyses in measuring skeletal maturation.Angle Orthod. 2006 Nov;76(6):984-9. doi: 10.2319/070605-217. Angle Orthod. 2006. PMID: 17090154
-
Assessment of Skeletal Age Using Hand-Wrist Radiographs following Bjork System.J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2018 Nov-Dec;8(6):482-487. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_315_18. Epub 2018 Nov 14. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2018. PMID: 30596037 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Skeletal maturation evaluation: which is the reliability of dental calcification Demirjian method versus hand-wrist X-ray in growing subjects? A systematic review.Acta Odontol Scand. 2024 May 3;83:230-237. doi: 10.2340/aos.v83.40485. Acta Odontol Scand. 2024. PMID: 38699981 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Growth Prediction in Orthodontics: ASystematic Review of Past Methods up to Artificial Intelligence.Children (Basel). 2025 Aug 3;12(8):1023. doi: 10.3390/children12081023. Children (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40868475 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Criteria for early diagnosis of third molar agenesis: a retrospective radiographic study.Dental Press J Orthod. 2023 Jul 17;28(3):e2321322. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.28.3.e2321322.oar. eCollection 2023. Dental Press J Orthod. 2023. PMID: 37466505 Free PMC article.
-
The relationship of mandibular radiomorphometric indices to skeletal age, chronological age and skeletal malocclusion type.J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Aug 1;9(8):e970-e975. doi: 10.4317/jced.53819. eCollection 2017 Aug. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017. PMID: 28936286 Free PMC article.
-
Identification of dental calcification stages as a predictor of skeletal development phase.Dental Press J Orthod. 2021 Sep 10;26(4):e2119292. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.26.4.e2119292.oar. eCollection 2021. Dental Press J Orthod. 2021. PMID: 34524378 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of cephalometric characteristics and skeletal maturation of the cervical vertebrae and hand-wrist in girls with central precocious puberty.Korean J Orthod. 2020 May 25;50(3):181-187. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2020.50.3.181. Korean J Orthod. 2020. PMID: 32475845 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sidlauskas A, Zilinskaite L, Svalkauskiene V. Mandibular pubertal growth spurt prediction. Part one: Method based on the hand-wrist radiographs. Stomatologija. 2005;7(1):16–20. - PubMed
-
- Houston WJ. Relationships between skeletal maturity estimated from hand-wrist radiographs and the timing of the adolescent growth spurt. Eur J Orthod. 1980;2(2):81–93. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources