Systematic Review: A Method at Risk for Being Corrupted
- PMID: 27854519
- PMCID: PMC5308162
- DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303518
Systematic Review: A Method at Risk for Being Corrupted
Abstract
The production of systematic reviews is increasing, but their credibility is under threat. Although systematic reviews are an important tool for policymaking, their influence can be weakened by methodological problems and poor policy relevance. Using Cochrane as an example, I address standards for systematic reviews, the influence of special interests on these reviews, and ways to increase their relevance for policymakers.
Similar articles
-
Symptomatic treatments for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 10;1(1):CD011776. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011776.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28072907 Free PMC article.
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 12065068
-
Behavioural interventions for smoking cessation: an overview and network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 4;1(1):CD013229. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013229.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 33411338 Free PMC article.
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11701100
-
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532236
Cited by
-
Reviews in environmental health: How systematic are they?Environ Int. 2021 Jul;152:106473. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106473. Epub 2021 Mar 30. Environ Int. 2021. PMID: 33798823 Free PMC article.
-
Stakeholder Involvement in Systematic Reviews: Lessons From Cochrane's Public Health and Health Systems Network.Am J Public Health. 2021 Jul;111(7):1210-1215. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306252. Am J Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34370524 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Conducting evaluations of evidence that are transparent, timely and can lead to health-protective actions.Environ Health. 2022 Dec 5;21(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12940-022-00926-z. Environ Health. 2022. PMID: 36471342 Free PMC article.
-
Invited Perspective: Why Systematic Reviews, Scoping Reviews, and Evidence-to-Decision Frameworks Are Critical for Transparent, Consistent, Equitable, and Science-Based Decision-Making in Environmental Health.Environ Health Perspect. 2024 Mar;132(3):31304. doi: 10.1289/EHP14346. Epub 2024 Mar 13. Environ Health Perspect. 2024. PMID: 38477608 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes as a smoking cessation intervention: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Tob Prev Cessat. 2021 Nov 22;7:69. doi: 10.18332/tpc/143077. eCollection 2021. Tob Prev Cessat. 2021. PMID: 34877438 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Higgins J, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester, England: Cochrane Collaboration and Wiley-Blackwell; 2008.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources