Community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus Papanicolaou cytology
- PMID: 27855089
- PMCID: PMC5073481
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011754
Community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus Papanicolaou cytology
Abstract
Objectives: The incidence of cervical cancer is up to 20-fold higher among First Nations women in Canada than the general population, probably due to lower participation in screening. Offering human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling in place of Papanicolaou (Pap) testing may eventually increase screening participation and reduce cervical cancer rates in this population.
Design: A community-randomised controlled screening trial.
Setting: First Nations communities in Northwest Ontario, Canada.
Participants: Women aged between 25 and 69, living in Robinson Superior Treaty First Nations. The community was the unit of randomisation.
Interventions: Women were asked to complete a questionnaire and have screening by HPV self-sampling (arm A) or Pap testing (arm B).
Primary outcome measures: The number of women who participated in cervical screening.
Randomisation: Community clusters were randomised to include approximately equivalent numbers of women in each arm.
Results: 6 communities were randomised to arm A and 5 to arm B. One community withdrew, leaving 5 communities in each group (834 eligible women). Participation was <25%. Using clustered intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, initial and cumulative averaged uptakes in arm A were 1.4-fold (20% vs 14.3%, p=0.628) and 1.3-fold (20.6% vs 16%, p=0.694) higher compared to arm B, respectively. Corresponding per protocol (PP) analysis indicates 2.2-fold (22.9% vs 10.6%, p=0.305) and 1.6-fold (22.9% vs 14.1%, p=0.448) higher uptakes in arm A compared to arm B. Screening uptake varied between communities (range 0-62.1%). Among women who completed a questionnaire (18.3% in arm A, 21.7% in arm B), the screening uptake was 1.8-fold (ITT; p=0.1132) or 3-fold (PP; p<0.01) higher in arm A versus arm B.
Conclusions: Pap and HPV self-sampling were compared in a marginalised, Canadian population. Results indicated a preference for self-sampling. More research on how to reach underscreened Indigenous women is necessary.
Trial registration number: ISRCTN84617261.
Keywords: HPV self-sampling; Indigenous health; Pap testing; cervical screening; cluster randomized controlled trial.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Conflict of interest statement
The ACCSS team received support from Roche Diagnostics (RD) for the HPV analyses of the self-collected samples. However, RD was not involved with the study design, the analyses or the writing of the manuscript.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of repeated self-sampling for HPV testing in primary cervical screening: a randomized study.BMC Cancer. 2020 Jul 13;20(1):645. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07085-9. BMC Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32660432 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Study protocol of the CHOiCE trial: a three-armed, randomized, controlled trial of home-based HPV self-sampling for non-participants in an organized cervical cancer screening program.BMC Cancer. 2016 Nov 3;16(1):835. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2859-z. BMC Cancer. 2016. PMID: 27809810 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized Intervention of Self-Collected Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing in Under-Screened Rural Women: Uptake of Screening and Acceptability.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016 May;25(5):489-97. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5348. Epub 2015 Nov 24. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016. PMID: 26598955 Clinical Trial.
-
High-risk HPV testing on self-sampled versus clinician-collected specimens: a review on the clinical accuracy and impact on population attendance in cervical cancer screening.Int J Cancer. 2013 May 15;132(10):2223-36. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27790. Epub 2012 Sep 14. Int J Cancer. 2013. PMID: 22907569 Review.
-
Invitation strategy of vaginal HPV self-sampling to improve participation in cervical cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 10;24(1):2461. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19881-0. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39256726 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Combined incentive actions, focusing on primary care professionals, to improve cervical cancer screening in women living in socioeconomically disadvantaged geographical areas: a study protocol of a hybrid cluster randomised effectiveness and implementation trial- RESISTE.BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 23;12(11):e065952. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065952. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36418118 Free PMC article.
-
Widening the offer of human papillomavirus self-sampling to all women eligible for cervical screening: Make haste slowly.Int J Cancer. 2023 Jul 1;153(1):8-19. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34358. Epub 2022 Nov 23. Int J Cancer. 2023. PMID: 36385698 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Does self-sampling for human papilloma virus testing have the potential to increase cervical cancer screening? An updated meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized clinical trials.Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 8;10:1003461. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1003461. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36568753 Free PMC article.
-
Self-administered versus provider-directed sampling in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study (ACCSS): a qualitative investigation with Canadian First Nations women.BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 1;7(8):e017384. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017384. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28864487 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of health education intervention on demand of women for cervical cancer screening: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2022 Oct 1;23(1):834. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06765-0. Trials. 2022. PMID: 36182909 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M et al. . GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2013. http://globocan.iarc.fr (accessed 21 Jun 2014).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous