Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Nov 17;6(11):e013325.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013325.

Effect of support group peer facilitator training programmes on peer facilitator and support group member outcomes: a systematic review

Vanessa C Delisle  1   2 , Stephanie T Gumuchian  1   3 , Lorie A Kloda  4 , Jill Boruff  5 , Ghassan El-Baalbaki  6 , Annett Körner  1   2 , Vanessa L Malcarne  7   8 , Brett D Thombs  9   10   11 ; Scleroderma Support Group Project Advisory Team
Collaborators, Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effect of support group peer facilitator training programmes on peer facilitator and support group member outcomes: a systematic review

Vanessa C Delisle et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: Peer facilitators play an important role in determining the success of many support groups for patients with medical illnesses. However, many facilitators do not receive training for their role and report a number of challenges in fulfilling their responsibilities. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects of training and support programmes for peer facilitators of support groups for people with medical illnesses on (1) the competency and self-efficacy of group facilitators and (2) self-efficacy for disease management, health outcomes and satisfaction with support groups among group members.

Methods: Searches included the CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases from inception through 8 April 2016; reference list reviews; citation tracking of included articles; and trial registry reviews. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in any language that evaluated the effects of training programmes for peer facilitators compared with no training or alternative training formats on (1) competency or self-efficacy of peer facilitators, and (2) self-efficacy for disease management, health outcomes and satisfaction with groups of group members. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess risk of bias.

Results: There were 9757 unique titles/abstracts and 2 full-text publications reviewed. 1 RCT met inclusion criteria. The study evaluated the confidence and self-efficacy of cancer support group facilitators randomised to 4 months access to a website and discussion forum (N=23; low resource) versus website, discussion forum and 2-day training workshop (N=29). There were no significant differences in facilitator confidence (Hedges' g=0.16, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.71) or self-efficacy (Hedges' g=0.31, 95% CI -0.24 to 0.86). Risk of bias was unclear or high for 4 of 6 domains.

Conclusions: Well-designed and well-conducted, adequately powered trials of peer support group facilitator training programmes for patients with medical illnesses are needed.

Trial registration number: CRD42014013601.

Keywords: EDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training); Support groups; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow chart. RCT, randomised controlled trial; PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lieberman MA, Winzelberg A, Golant M et al. . Online support groups for Parkinson's patients: a pilot study of effectiveness. Soc Work Health Care 2006;42:23–38. 10.1300/J010v42n02_02 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barg FK, Gullatte MM. Cancer support groups: meeting the needs of African Americans with cancer. Semin Oncol Nurs 2001;17:171–8. 10.1053/sonu.2001.25946 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Davison KP, Pennebaker JW, Dickerson SS. Who talks? The social psychology of illness support groups. Am Psychol 2000;55:205–17. - PubMed
    1. Ussher J, Kristen L, Butow P et al. . What do cancer support groups provide which other supportive relationships do not? The experience of peer support groups for people with cancer. Soc Sci Med 2006;62:2565–76. - PubMed
    1. Docherty A. Experience, functions and benefits of a cancer support group. Patient Educ Couns 2004;55:87–93. 10.1016/j.pec.2003.08.002 - DOI - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources