Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan;133(1):5-12.
doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1643-0. Epub 2016 Nov 17.

The current consensus on the clinical management of intracranial ependymoma and its distinct molecular variants

Affiliations

The current consensus on the clinical management of intracranial ependymoma and its distinct molecular variants

Kristian W Pajtler et al. Acta Neuropathol. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Multiple independent genomic profiling efforts have recently identified clinically and molecularly distinct subgroups of ependymoma arising from all three anatomic compartments of the central nervous system (supratentorial brain, posterior fossa, and spinal cord). These advances motivated a consensus meeting to discuss: (1) the utility of current histologic grading criteria, (2) the integration of molecular-based stratification schemes in future clinical trials for patients with ependymoma and (3) current therapy in the context of molecular subgroups. Discussion at the meeting generated a series of consensus statements and recommendations from the attendees, which comment on the prognostic evaluation and treatment decisions of patients with intracranial ependymoma (WHO Grade II/III) based on the knowledge of its molecular subgroups. The major consensus among attendees was reached that treatment decisions for ependymoma (outside of clinical trials) should not be based on grading (II vs III). Supratentorial and posterior fossa ependymomas are distinct diseases, although the impact on therapy is still evolving. Molecular subgrouping should be part of all clinical trials henceforth.

Keywords: Ependymoma; Posterior fossa; RELA; Subgroups; Treatment; Trial; YAP1.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
General and molecular subgroup specific consensus statements on the clinical management of intracranial ependymoma

References

    1. Atkinson JM, Shelat AA, Carcaboso AM, Kranenburg TA, Arnold LA, Boulos N, Wright K, Johnson RA, Poppleton H, Mohankumar KM, et al. An integrated in vitro and in vivo high-throughput screen identifies treatment leads for ependymoma. Cancer Cell. 2011;20:384–399. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.08.013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barszczyk M, Buczkowicz P, Castelo-Branco P, Mack SC, Ramaswamy V, Mangerel J, Agnihotri S, Remke M, Golbourn B, Pajovic S, et al. Telomerase inhibition abolishes the tumorigenicity of pediatric ependymoma tumor-initiating cells. Acta Neuropathol. 2014;128:863–877. doi: 10.1007/s00401-014-1327-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bouffet E, Foreman N. Chemotherapy for intracranial ependymomas. Child’s Nerv Syst ChNS. 1999;15:563–570. doi: 10.1007/s003810050544. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bouffet E, Hawkins CE, Ballourah W, Taylor MD, Bartels UK, Schoenhoff N, Tsangaris E, Huang A, Kulkarni A, Mabbot DJ, et al. Survival benefit for pediatric patients with recurrent ependymoma treated with reirradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83:1541–1548. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.039. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bouffet E, Perilongo G, Canete A, Massimino M. Intracranial ependymomas in children: a critical review of prognostic factors and a plea for cooperation. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1998;30:319–329. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-911X(199806)30:6<319::AID-MPO1>3.0.CO;2-H. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types