Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr;24(4):458-466.
doi: 10.1111/acem.13135. Epub 2017 Mar 17.

Minimizing Attrition for Multisite Emergency Care Research

Affiliations

Minimizing Attrition for Multisite Emergency Care Research

Bret A Nicks et al. Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Loss to follow-up of enrolled patients (a.k.a. attrition) is a major threat to study validity and power. Minimizing attrition can be challenging even under ideal research conditions, including the presence of adequate funding, experienced study personnel, and a refined research infrastructure. Emergency care research is shifting toward enrollment through multisite networks, but there have been limited descriptions of approaches to minimize attrition for these multicenter emergency care studies. This concept paper describes a stepwise approach to minimize attrition, using a case example of a multisite emergency department prospective cohort of over 3,000 patients that has achieved a 30-day direct phone follow-up attrition rate of <3%. The seven areas of approach to minimize attrition in this study focused on patient selection, baseline contact data collection, patient incentives, patient tracking, central phone banks, local enrollment site assistance, and continuous performance monitoring. Appropriate study design, including consideration of these methods to reduce attrition, will be time well spent and may improve study validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest:

None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Calendar Patient Tracking in RedCAP
Figure 2
Figure 2
Continuous Performance Monitoring of Follow-Up

References

    1. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. IOM report: the future of emergency care in the United States health system. Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Oct;13(10):1081–1085. - PubMed
    1. D'Onofrio G, Jauch E, Jagoda A, Allen MH, Anglin D, Barsan WG, et al. NIH Roundtable on Opportunities to Advance Research on Neurologic and Psychiatric Emergencies. Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Nov;56(5):551–564. - PubMed
    1. Cairns CB, Maier RV, Adeoye O, Baptiste D, Barsan WG, Blackbourne L, et al. NIH Roundtable on Emergency Trauma Research. Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Nov;56(5):538–550. - PubMed
    1. Kaji AH, Lewis RJ, Beavers-May T, Berg R, Bulger E, Cairns C, et al. Summary of NIH Medical-Surgical Emergency Research Roundtable held on April 30 to May 1, 2009. Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Nov;56(5):522–537. - PubMed
    1. Cofield S, Conwit R, Barson W, Quinn J. Recruitment and Retention of Patients into Emergency Medicine Clinical Trials. Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Oct;17(10):1104–1112. - PMC - PubMed