Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Nov;95(46):e5434.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005434.

Early initiation of renal replacement treatment in patients with acute kidney injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Early initiation of renal replacement treatment in patients with acute kidney injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Hongwei Wang et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with a substantially increased risk of mortality for many hospitalized patients. It has been suggested that early initiation of renal replacement treatment has a favorable outcome in critically ill patients complicated with AKI. However, results of studies evaluating the effect of early initiation strategy of renal replacement treatment on AKI have been controversial and contradictory. The aim of this meta-analysis is to examine the effect of early initiation of renal replacement treatment on patients with AKI.

Methods: The authors searched relevant studies in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library through August 2016. We searched for all eligible randomized controlled trials with regard to the role of early initiation of renal replacement treatment in mortality among patients with AKI. We extracted the following information from each study: mortality, length of stay in intensive care unit (ICU), and length of stay in hospital. Random and fixed effect models were used for pooling data.

Results: Twelve trials including 1756 patients were included. The results of this meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the mortality of early and delayed strategy for the initiation of renal replacement treatment using the random effect model (odds ratio = 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-1.19; P = 0.25), with wild heterogeneity (chi = 33.50; I = 67%). Analyses from subgroup sepsis and postsurgery came to similar results. In addition, compared with delayed initiation strategy, early initiation showed no significant advantage in length of stay in ICU (mean difference = -0.80; 95% CI, -2.59 to 0.99; P = 0.56) and length of stay in hospital (mean difference = -7.69; 95% CI, -16.14 to 0.76; P = 0.07).

Conclusion: According to the results from present meta-analysis, early initiation of renal replacement treatment showed no survival benefits in patients with AKI. To achieve optimal timing of renal replacement treatment, further large multicenter randomized trials, with widely accepted and standardized definition of early initiation, are still needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of selection process of eligible studies. RCT = randomized controlled trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot for overall mortality.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot for subgroup analyses of mortality. (A) Subgroup analysis for patients with sepsis. (B) Subgroup analysis for patients after surgery. (C–E) Subgroup analysis for mortality at days 30, 60, and 90, respectively.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot for length of stay in intensive care unit.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot for length of stay in hospital.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hoste EA, Bagshaw SM, Bellomo R, et al. Epidemiology of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: the multinational AKI-EPI study. Intensive Care Med 2015; 41:1411–1423. - PubMed
    1. Hsu CN, Lee CT, Su CH, et al. Incidence, outcomes, and risk factors of community-acquired and hospital-acquired acute kidney injury: a retrospective cohort study. Medicine 2016; 95:e3674. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mehta RL, Cerda J, Burdmann EA, et al. International Society of Nephrology's 0by25 initiative for acute kidney injury (zero preventable deaths by 2025): a human rights case for nephrology. Lancet 2015; 385:2616–2643. - PubMed
    1. Gaudry S, Hajage D, Schortgen F, et al. Initiation strategies for renal-replacement therapy in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med 2016; 375:122–133. - PubMed
    1. Lins RL, Elseviers MM, Van der Niepen P, et al. Intermittent versus continuous renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury patients admitted to the intensive care unit: results of a randomized clinical trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009; 24:512–518. - PubMed

MeSH terms