Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2017 Feb 1;123(3):485-493.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.29969. Epub 2016 Nov 10.

Screening for depression in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: Feasibility and identification of effective tools in the NRG Oncology RTOG 0841 trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Screening for depression in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: Feasibility and identification of effective tools in the NRG Oncology RTOG 0841 trial

Lynne I Wagner et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Brief tools are needed to screen oncology outpatients for depressive symptoms.

Methods: Patients starting radiotherapy for the first diagnosis of any tumor completed distress screening tools, including the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), the 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2), the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer (NCCN-DT), and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL) (25-item version). Patients exceeding validated cutoff scores and a systematic sample of patients whose screening was negative completed the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) mood disorder modules via telephone.

Results: Four hundred sixty-three patients from 35 community-based radiation oncology sites and 2 academic radiation oncology sites were recruited. Sixty-six percent of the 455 eligible patients (n = 299) were women, and the eligible patients had breast (45%), gastrointestinal (11%), lung (10%), gynecologic (6%), or other cancers (27%). Seventy-five (16.5%) exceeded screening cutoffs for depressive symptoms. Forty-two of these patients completed the SCID. Another 37 patients whose screening was negative completed the SCID. Among the 79 patients completing the SCID, 8 (10.1%) met the criteria for major depression, 2 (2.5%) met the criteria for dysthymia, and 6 (7.6%) met the criteria for an adjustment disorder. The PHQ-2 demonstrated good psychometric properties for screening for mood disorders with a cutoff score of ≥3 (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve [AUC], 0.83) and was comparable to the PHQ-9 ( > 9; AUC = 0.85). The NCCN-DT did not detect depression (AUC = 0.59).

Conclusions: The PHQ-2 demonstrated good psychometric properties for screening for mood disorders, which were equivalent to the PHQ-9 and superior to the NCCN-DT. These findings support using the PHQ-2 to identify patients in need of further assessment for depression, which has a low prevalence but is a clinically significant comorbidity. These findings could inform the implementation of distress screening accreditation standards. Cancer 2017;123:485-493. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Keywords: depression; depression screening; distress; distress screening; mood disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study procedures
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) Curve of screening measures
Figure 3
Figure 3
ROC Curve of PHQ-2

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adler NE, Page A. Cancer care for the whole patient : meeting psychosocial health needs. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2008. Institute of Medicine Committee on Psychosocial Services to Cancer Patients/Families in a Community S. - PubMed
    1. Jacobsen PB, Wagner LI. A new quality standard: The integration of psychosocial care into routine cancer care. J. Clin. Oncol. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2012;30(11):1154–1159. - PubMed
    1. Holland JC, Andersen B, Breitbart WS, et al. Distress management. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN. 2013;11(2):190–209. - PubMed
    1. McNiff KK, Neuss MN, Jacobson JO, Eisenberg PD, Kadlubek P, Simone JV. Measuring supportive care in medical oncology practice: lessons learned from the quality oncology practice initiative. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2008;26(23):3832–3837. - PubMed
    1. American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer. Cancer Program Standards 2012: ensuring patient-centered care. 2011 https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/cancer/coc/standards.

Publication types