Stratifying Patients with Diabetes into Clinically Relevant Groups by Combination of Chronic Conditions to Identify Gaps in Quality of Care
- PMID: 27861829
- PMCID: PMC5785301
- DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12607
Stratifying Patients with Diabetes into Clinically Relevant Groups by Combination of Chronic Conditions to Identify Gaps in Quality of Care
Abstract
Objective: To find clinically relevant combinations of chronic conditions among patients with diabetes and to examine their relationships with six diabetes quality metrics.
Data sources/study setting: Twenty-nine thousand five hundred and sixty-two adult patients with diabetes seen at eight Midwestern U.S. health systems during 2010-2011.
Study design: We retrospectively evaluated the relationship between six diabetes quality metrics and patients' combinations of chronic conditions. We analyzed 12 conditions that were concordant with diabetes care to define five mutually exclusive combinations of conditions ("classes") based on condition co-occurrence. We used logistic regression to quantify the relationship between condition classes and quality metrics, adjusted for patient demographics and utilization.
Data collection: We extracted electronic health record data using a standardized algorithm.
Principal findings: We found the following condition classes: severe cardiac, cardiac, noncardiac vascular, risk factors, and no concordant comorbidities. Adjusted odds ratios and 95 percent confidence intervals for glycemic control were, respectively, 1.95 (1.7-2.2), 1.6 (1.4-1.9), 1.3 (1.2-1.5), and 1.3 (1.2-1.4) compared to the class with no comorbidities. Results showed similar patterns for other metrics.
Conclusions: Patients had distinct quality metric achievement by condition class, and those in less severe classes were less likely to achieve diabetes metrics.
Keywords: Diabetes; multimorbidity; multiple chronic conditions; public reporting; quality.
© Health Research and Educational Trust.
Figures

Notes. Class 1: No diabetes‐concordant conditions. Class 2: Risk factor conditions only. Class 3: Non‐cardiac vascular disease without cardiac disease, with or without risk factors. Class 4: Cardiac disease without advanced cardiac disease, with or without risk factors. Class 5: Advanced cardiac disease, with or without other diabetes‐concordant conditions.
References
-
- American Diabetes Association . 2016a. “Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management (Standards of Diabetes Care).” Diabetes Care 39 (Suppl 1): S60–7. - PubMed
-
- American Diabetes Association . 2016b. “Strategies for Improving Care (Standards for Diabetes Care).” Diabetes Care 39 (Suppl 1): S6–12. - PubMed
-
- Bayliss, E. A. , Bonds D. E., Boyd C. M., Davis M. M., Finke B., Fox M. H., Glasgow R. E., Goodman R. A., Heurtin‐Roberts S., Lachenmayr S., Lind C., Madigan E. A., Meyers D. S., Mintz S., Nilsen W. J., Okun S., Ruiz S., Salive M. E., and Stange K. C.. 2014. “Understanding the Context of Health for Persons with Multiple Chronic Conditions: Moving from What Is the Matter to What Matters.” Annals of Family Medicine 12 (3): 260–9. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical