Blind Biobanking of the Prostatectomy Specimen: Critical Evaluation of the Existing Techniques and Development of the New 4-Level Tissue Extraction Model With High Sampling Efficacy
- PMID: 27862105
- DOI: 10.1002/pros.23278
Blind Biobanking of the Prostatectomy Specimen: Critical Evaluation of the Existing Techniques and Development of the New 4-Level Tissue Extraction Model With High Sampling Efficacy
Abstract
Background: Fresh tissue is mandatory to perform high-quality translation studies. Several models for tissue extraction from prostatectomy specimens without guidance by frozen sections are already introduced. However, little is known about the sampling efficacy of these models, which should provide representative tissue in adequate volumes, account for multifocality and heterogeneity of tumor, not violate the routine final pathological examination, and perform quickly without frozen section-based histological control. The aim of the study was to evaluate the sampling efficacy of the existing tissue extraction models without guidance by frozen sections ("blind") and to develop an optimized model for tissue extraction.
Methods: Five hundred thirty-three electronic maps of the tumor distribution in prostates from a single-center cohort of the patients subjected to radical prostatectomy were used for analysis. Six available models were evaluated in silico for their sampling efficacy. Additionally, a novel model achieving the best sampling efficacy was developed.
Results: The available models showed high efficacies for sampling "any part" from the tumor (up to 100%), but were uniformly low in efficacy to sample all tumor foci from the specimens (with the best technique sampling only 51.6% of the all tumor foci). The novel 4-level extraction model achieved a sampling efficacy of 93.1% for all tumor foci.
Conclusions: The existing "blind" tissue extraction models from prostatectomy specimens without frozen sections control are suitable to target tumor tissues but these tissues do not represent the whole tumor. The novel 4-level model provides the highest sampling efficacy and a promising potential for integration into routine. Prostate 77: 396-405, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Keywords: biobank; extraction; fresh-frozen; methodology; prostate cancer; prostatectomy; research; tissue.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Method for sampling tissue for research which preserves pathological data in radical prostatectomy.Prostate. 2013 Jan;73(2):194-202. doi: 10.1002/pros.22556. Epub 2012 Jul 16. Prostate. 2013. PMID: 22806573
-
A novel technique for biobanking of large sections of radical prostatectomy specimens.Histopathology. 2018 Feb;72(3):481-489. doi: 10.1111/his.13386. Epub 2017 Nov 21. Histopathology. 2018. PMID: 28881048
-
Ceramic foam plates: a new tool for processing fresh radical prostatectomy specimens.Virchows Arch. 2014 Dec;465(6):637-42. doi: 10.1007/s00428-014-1665-8. Epub 2014 Oct 17. Virchows Arch. 2014. PMID: 25323812
-
Handling of radical prostatectomy specimens.Histopathology. 2012 Jan;60(1):118-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.04002.x. Histopathology. 2012. PMID: 22212081 Review.
-
Performing and Cutting Frozen Sections.Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1897:279-288. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8935-5_24. Methods Mol Biol. 2019. PMID: 30539452 Review.
Cited by
-
Ex Vivo Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy (FCM) Ensures Representative Tissue in Prostate Cancer Biobanking: A Feasibility Study.Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Oct 11;23(20):12103. doi: 10.3390/ijms232012103. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. PMID: 36292970 Free PMC article.
-
PEOPLE: PatiEnt prOstate samPLes for rEsearch, a tissue collection pathway utilizing magnetic resonance imaging data to target tumor and benign tissue in fresh radical prostatectomy specimens.Prostate. 2019 May;79(7):768-777. doi: 10.1002/pros.23782. Epub 2019 Feb 26. Prostate. 2019. PMID: 30807665 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical