Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in twelve European countries results of the European cardiac rehabilitation registry
- PMID: 27863363
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.059
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in twelve European countries results of the European cardiac rehabilitation registry
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum to "Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in twelve European countries: Results of the European Cardiac Rehabilitation Registry" [Int. J. Cardiol. 228 (2017) 58-67].Int J Cardiol. 2017 Sep 1;242:50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.04.017. Epub 2017 May 27. Int J Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28558920 No abstract available.
Abstract
Aim: Results from EuroCaReD study should serve as a benchmark to improve guideline adherence and treatment quality of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in Europe.
Methods and results: Data from 2.054 CR patients in 12 European countries were derived from 69 centres. 76% were male. Indication for CR differed between countries being predominantly ACS in Switzerland (79%), Portugal (62%) and Germany (61%), elective PCI in Greece (37%), Austria (36%) and Spain (32%), and CABG in Croatia and Russia (36%). A minority of patients presented with chronic heart failure (4%). At CR start, most patients already were under medication according to current guidelines for the treatment of CV risk factors. A wide range of CR programme designs was found (duration 3 to 24weeks; total number of sessions 30 to 196). Patient programme adherence after admission was high (85%). With reservations that eCRF follow-up data exchange remained incomplete, patient CV risk profiles experienced only small improvements. CR success as defined by an increase of exercise capacity >25W was significantly higher in young patients and those who were employed. Results differed by countries. After CR only 9% of patients were admitted to a structured post-CR programme.
Conclusions: Clinical characteristics of CR patients, indications and programmes in Europe are different. Guideline adherence is poor. Thus, patient selection and CR programme designs should become more evidence-based. Routine eCRF documentation of CR results throughout European countries was not sufficient in its first application because of incomplete data exchange. Therefore better adherence of CR centres to minimal routine clinical standards is requested.
Keywords: Bench marking; Cardiac rehabilitation; Cardiovascular prevention programmes; Guideline adherence; Internet-based survey for cardiovascular disease; Patient selection; Quality assurance.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
A EUropean study on effectiveness and sustainability of current Cardiac Rehabilitation programmes in the Elderly: Design of the EU-CaRE randomised controlled trial.Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Oct;23(2 suppl):27-40. doi: 10.1177/2047487316670063. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 27892423 Clinical Trial.
-
Cardiac rehabilitation availability and delivery in Europe: How does it differ by region and compare with other high-income countries?: Endorsed by the European Association of Preventive Cardiology.Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019 Jul;26(11):1131-1146. doi: 10.1177/2047487319827453. Epub 2019 Feb 20. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019. PMID: 30782007
-
Cardiac rehabilitation in Europe.Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2014 Mar-Apr;56(5):551-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Oct 5. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2014. PMID: 24607021 Review.
-
[ICAROS (Italian survey on CardiAc RehabilitatiOn and Secondary prevention after cardiac revascularization): temporary report of the first prospective, longitudinal registry of the cardiac rehabilitation network GICR/IACPR].Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2012 Jun;78(2):73-8. doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2012.126. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2012. PMID: 23167148 Italian.
-
Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: from knowledge to implementation. A position paper from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation.Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010 Feb;17(1):1-17. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3283313592. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010. PMID: 19952757 Review.
Cited by
-
Australian cardiac rehabilitation exercise parameter characteristics and perceptions of high-intensity interval training: a cross-sectional survey.Open Access J Sports Med. 2018 Apr 30;9:79-89. doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S160306. eCollection 2018. Open Access J Sports Med. 2018. PMID: 29750058 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in the presentation and management of patients with severe aortic stenosis in different European centres.Open Heart. 2020 Sep;7(2):e001345. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001345. Open Heart. 2020. PMID: 32934015 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Cardiopulmonary Fitness with High-Risk Myocardial Infarction.Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Sep 23;10(10):1849. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10101849. Healthcare (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36292295 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of CPET Combined with Systematic Education of Cardiac Rehabilitation After PCI: A Real-World Evaluation in ACS Patients.Adv Ther. 2021 Sep;38(9):4836-4846. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01871-y. Epub 2021 Aug 5. Adv Ther. 2021. PMID: 34351565 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of Intensive Cardiac Rehabilitation in High-Risk Patients with Cardiovascular Disease in Real-World Practice.Nutrients. 2021 Oct 29;13(11):3883. doi: 10.3390/nu13113883. Nutrients. 2021. PMID: 34836144 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous