Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 18;16(1):1169.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3820-4.

The role of social position and depressive symptoms in adolescence for life-course trajectories of education and work: a cohort study

Affiliations

The role of social position and depressive symptoms in adolescence for life-course trajectories of education and work: a cohort study

Evelina Landstedt et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: While a vast amount of studies confirm the social reproduction of class and status from one generation to the next, less is known about the role of health in the child generation for these processes. Research has shown that particularly mental distress in adolescence is important for future life chances. This study aimed to examine the importance of parental socioeconomic position and depressive symptoms in youth for life-course trajectories of education and labour market attachment among men and women.

Methods: Based on four waves of questionnaire data from the Northern Swedish Cohort (n = 1,001), consisting of individuals born in 1965, three steps of gender-separate analyses were undertaken. First, the individual trajectories of education and labour market attachment from age 18 to 42 were mapped through sequence analysis. Second, cluster analysis was used to identify typical trajectories. Third, two indicators of parental socioeconomic position - occupational class and employment status - and depressive symptoms at age 16 were used in multinomial regression analyses to predict adult life-course trajectories.

Results: Four typical trajectories were identified for men, of which three were characterised by stable employment and various lengths of education, and the fourth reflected a more unstable situation. Among women, five trajectories emerged, characterised by more instability compared to men. Low parental occupational class and unemployment were significantly associated with a higher risk of ending up in less advantaged trajectories for men while, for women, this was only the case for occupational class. Youth levels of depressive symptoms did not significantly differ across the trajectories.

Conclusions: This study found support for the intergenerational reproduction of social position, particularly when measured in terms of parental occupational class. Youth depressive symptoms did not show clear differences across types of trajectories, subsequently impeding such symptoms to trigger any selection processes. While this could be a consequence of the specific framework of the current study, it may also suggest that depressive symptoms in youth are not a root cause for the more complex processes through which how social position develops across life. The possible impact of welfare and labour market policies is discussed.

Keywords: Depressive symptoms; Life course; Sequence analysis; Social position; Social reproduction; Sweden; Trajectory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a. The distribution of the seven categories of labour market attachment among men (n = 492), 1983–2007 (ages 18–42). b. The distribution of the seven categories of labour market attachment among women (n = 463), 1983–2007 (ages 18–42)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a. Typical trajectories of education and labour market attachment among men (n = 492), across ages 18–42 (1983–2007). Note: Trajectory 1: 29.1% (n = 143); Trajectory 2: 22.2% (n = 109); Trajectory 3: 31.5% (n = 155); Trajectory 4: 17.3% (n = 85). Y-axis shows the proportion of individuals, x-axis shows age. b. Typical trajectories of education and labour market attachment among women (n = 463), across ages 18–42 (1983–2007). Note: Trajectory 1: 18.1% (n = 84); Trajectory 2: 37.4% (n = 173); Trajectory 3: 15.6% (n = 72); Trajectory 4: 17.3% (n = 80); Trajectory 5: 11.7% (n = 54). Y-axis shows the proportion of individuals, x-axis shows age

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hilmert S. Analysing Intergenerational Transmissions: From Social Mobility to Social Reproduction. In: Class and Stratification Analysis (Comparative Social Research, Volume 30). edn. Birkelund GE editor: Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2013. p. 131–157.
    1. Erikson R, Goldthorpe JH. Intergenerational inequality: A sociological perspective. J Econ Perspect. 2002;16(3):31–44. doi: 10.1257/089533002760278695. - DOI
    1. Ermisch J, Jäntti M, Smeeding T. From parents to children: The intergenerational transmission of advantage. New York: Russell Sage; 2012.
    1. Solon G. Theoretical models of inequality transmission across multiple generations. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility. 2014;35:13–18. doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2013.09.005. - DOI
    1. Stansfeld SA, Clark C, Rodgers B, Caldwell T, Power C. Repeated exposure to socioeconomic disadvantage and health selection as life course pathways to mid-life depressive and anxiety disorders. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2011;46(7):549–558. doi: 10.1007/s00127-010-0221-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed