Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec;25(4):229-234.
doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1569992. Epub 2015 Dec 31.

Visual-Functional Mismatch Between Coronary Angiography, Fractional Flow Reserve, and Quantitative Coronary Angiography

Affiliations

Visual-Functional Mismatch Between Coronary Angiography, Fractional Flow Reserve, and Quantitative Coronary Angiography

Morteza Safi et al. Int J Angiol. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Anatomical and functional mismatches are not uncommon in the assessment of coronary lesions. The aim of this study was to identify clinical and lesion-specific factors affecting angiographic, anatomical, and functional mismatch in intermediate coronary lesions. In patients who underwent coronary angiography for clinical reasons, fractional flow reserve (FFR), and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analyses for intermediate stenotic lesions were performed simultaneously. Mismatches between the measured values were analyzed. A total of 95 intermediate lesions were assessed simultaneously by visual angiography, FFR, and QCA. The visual-FFR mismatch was found in 40% of the lesions while reverse visual-FFR mismatch was determined in nearly 14% of the lesions. Mismatch and reverse mismatch between FFR and QCA parameters were observed in 10 and 23% of the lesions. FFR value was significant in 32% of the lesions while visually significant stenosis was shown in 61% of the lesions. Among the visual-FFR reverse mismatch group, the prevalence of culprit lesions within the left anterior descending (LAD) was significantly higher than other vessels (p value < 0.02). There were high frequencies of angiographic, QCA, and functional mismatches in analyses of intermediate coronary lesions. LAD lesions showed the highest mismatch. Angiographic or QCA estimation of lesion severity has consistently resulted in inappropriate stenting of functionally nonsignificant lesions or undertreatment of significant lesions based on FFR.

Keywords: FFR; QCA; angiography; coronary imaging; coronary intervention; ischemia; stenosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Correlation between FFR and MLD. FFR, fractional flow reserve; MLD; minimum luminal diameter.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Correlation between FFR and REFD. FFR, fractional flow reserve; REFD, reference diameter.

References

    1. Tobis J, Azarbal B, Slavin L. Assessment of intermediate severity coronary lesions in the catheterization laboratory. 2007;49(8):839–848. - PubMed
    1. Zijlstra F, van Ommeren J, Reiber J H, Serruys P W. Does the quantitative assessment of coronary artery dimensions predict the physiologic significance of a coronary stenosis? Circulation. 1987;75(6):1154–1161. - PubMed
    1. Kirkeeide R L, Gould K L, Parsel L. Assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilation. VII. Validation of coronary flow reserve as a single integrated functional measure of stenosis severity reflecting all its geometric dimensions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;7(1):103–113. - PubMed
    1. Zijlstra F, Fioretti P, Reiber J H, Serruys P W. Which cineangiographically assessed anatomic variable correlates best with functional measurements of stenosis severity? A comparison of quantitative analysis of the coronary cineangiogram with measured coronary flow reserve and exercise/redistribution thallium-201 scintigraphy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12(3):686–691. - PubMed
    1. Gould K L. Percent coronary stenosis: battered gold standard, pernicious relic or clinical practicality? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;11(4):886–888. - PubMed