Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Oct;5(4):291-294.
doi: 10.21037/tp.2016.10.01.

Laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation (LEVUR): a systematic review

Affiliations
Review

Laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation (LEVUR): a systematic review

Alessandra Farina et al. Transl Pediatr. 2016 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation is a feasible method for treating ureteral pathology with good preliminary results in the literature. In this study, we review medium term results for laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation and discuss current developments of this procedure.

Methods: Medline and Embase databases were searched using relevant key terms to identify reports of paediatric laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation (LEVUR). Literature reviews, case reports, series of <3 children and adult studies (age >20 years) were excluded.

Results: Five studies were assessed, overall, 69 LEVUR were performed in children. Despite different surgical technique, in all case the technique was respected. Patient demographics, preoperative symptoms, radiological imaging, complications, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Median success rate was 96%. Complications were reported in five cases.

Conclusions: This study is limited by the data given in the individual series: varied criteria used for patient selection and outcome as well as inconsistent pre- and post-operative imaging data precluded a meta-analysis. But it demonstrates that the laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation is an effective procedure with good medium-term results. We believe that in well selected patients this procedure will become an established treatment option.

Keywords: Laparoscopy; medium-term outcome; ureteral reimplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Streem SB, Franke JJ, Smith JA. Management of upper urinary tract obstruction. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED Jr, et al. editors. Campbell’s urology. 8th edition. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co., 2003:463-512.
    1. Benson MC, Ring KS, Olsson CA. Ureteral reconstruction and bypass: experience with ileal interposition, the Boari flap-psoas hitch and renal autotransplantation. J Urol 1990;143:20-3. - PubMed
    1. Challacombe B, Dasgupta P. Reconstruction of the lower urinary tract by laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Curr Opin Urol 2007;17:390-5. 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3282f07488 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stief CG, Jonas U, Petry KU, et al. Ureteric reconstruction. BJU Int 2003;91:138-42. 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.03060.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Riedmiller H, Becht E, Hertle L, et al. Psoas-hitch ureteroneocystostomy: experience with 181 cases. Eur Urol 1984;10:145-50. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources