Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2016 Nov 15;594(22):6569-6572.
doi: 10.1113/JP273348.

Are stem cell-derived neural cells physiologically credible?

Affiliations
Editorial

Are stem cell-derived neural cells physiologically credible?

Andrew D Randall. J Physiol. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Electrophysiological recordings from iPSC‐derived neurons at physiological temperature
A, example sweeps from a current clamp recording from a typical human iPSC‐derived sensory neuron. Current pulses of 500 ms duration of the indicated amplitudes were applied to cells at rest for the times shown by the arrowheads; note the ability to support robust repetitive firing. B, an example first spike elicited by a depolarizing current injection (left), its first derivative (centre), and a standard phase‐plane plot (right) from a typical iPSC‐derived sensory neuron. Note the fast rising spikes (almost 500 V s−1) and threshold of approximately –40 mV. C, pooled data plotting rate of action potential rise in many iPSC‐derived neurons created from four different control human donors. D, pooled current–voltage relationships for the voltage‐gated Na+ current (open circles) and K+ current (filled squares) recorded from 12 nucleated macropatches isolated from the cell body of iPSC‐derived sensory neurons. E, right, a current clamp recording from an iPSC‐derived forebrain neuron grown for ∼3 weeks in the media described in Telezhkin et al. (2016) within a PuraMatrix‐based 3D culture. Left, a phase plane plot from this neuron for the first action potential fired in response to the depolarizing current injection. Panels A–D, data from A.R. and Malgorzata Mis (University of Bristol); panel E, data from A.R. and Jane Hancock (University of Bristol).

References

    1. Alexandrou AJ, Brown AR, Chapman ML, et al (2016). Subtype‐selective small molecule inhibitors reveal a fundamental role for Nav1.7 in nociceptor electrogenesis, axonal conduction and presynaptic release. PLoS One 11, e0152405. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown JT, Chin J, Leiser SC, Pangalos MN & Randall AD (2011). Altered intrinsic neuronal excitability and reduced Na+ currents in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging 32, 2109e1–2109.e14. - PubMed
    1. Cao L, McDonnell A, Nitzsche A, et al (2016). Pharmacological reversal of a pain phenotype in iPSC‐derived sensory neurons and patients with inherited erythromelalgia. Sci Transl Med 8, 335ra56. - PubMed
    1. Chambers SM, Qi Y, Mica Y, Lee G, Zhang X‐J, Niu L, Bilsland J, Cao L, Stevens E, Whiting P, Shi S‐H & Studer L (2012). Combined small‐molecule inhibition accelerates developmental timing and converts human pluripotent stem cells into nociceptors. Nat Biotechnol 30, 715–720. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hill E, Nagel D, Parri R & Coleman M (2016). Stem cell‐derived astrocytes: are they physiologically credible? J Physiol 594, 6595–6606. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types