Comparison of the effects of Truview PCD™ video laryngoscopy and Macintosh blade direct laryngoscopy in geriatric patients
- PMID: 27871540
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.09.010
Comparison of the effects of Truview PCD™ video laryngoscopy and Macintosh blade direct laryngoscopy in geriatric patients
Abstract
Study objective: To compare the effects of Truview PCD™ video laryngoscopy (TVL) and Macintosh blade direct laryngoscopy (MDL) on hemodynamic responses observed during laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation conditions in geriatric patients.
Design: Randomized prospective study.
Setting: Operating room.
Patients: One hundred patients in the risk group American Society of Anesthesiologists I to III aged 65 years and older underwent elective surgery under general anesthesia.
Interventions: This prospective study was performed between January 2014 and February 2015 after institutional ethics committee approval. Patients were randomly allocated to 2 groups, namely, TVL and MDL.
Measurements: Hemodynamic parameters, modified Cormack-Lehane grade, intubation period, and preoperative examination (age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists, modified Mallampati test score, and thyromental and sternomental distances) of patients were evaluated.
Main results: There were no statistically significant differences in hemodynamic responses (heart rates and mean arterial pressure) between the 2 groups (P>.05). The median intubation period in the TVL group was significantly higher than observed in the MDL group (t=4.594; P<.05). The laryngoscopy views in TVL group were better than the views in MDL group. The Cormack-Lehane grade in the TVL group was lower when compared to the MDL group.
Conclusion: The TVL system does not provide significant hemodynamic response sparing or shorten orotracheal intubation times when compared to MDL in geriatric patients.
Keywords: Geriatric patients; Hemodynamic parameters; Video laryngoscopy.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Comparing direct and indirect laryngoscopy: Study design is crucial.J Clin Anesth. 2017 May;38:22-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.01.019. Epub 2017 Jan 13. J Clin Anesth. 2017. PMID: 28372667 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources