Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan;67(654):e49-e56.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X688357. Epub 2016 Nov 21.

Patient perspectives on delays in diagnosis and treatment of cancer: a qualitative analysis of free-text data

Rachel K Parsonage  1 , Julia Hiscock  1 , Rebecca-Jane Law  1 , Richard D Neal  2
Affiliations

Patient perspectives on delays in diagnosis and treatment of cancer: a qualitative analysis of free-text data

Rachel K Parsonage et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Earlier cancer diagnosis is crucial in improving cancer survival. The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership Module 4 (ICBP4) is a quantitative survey study that explores the reasons for delays in diagnosis and treatment of breast, colorectal, lung, and ovarian cancer. To further understand the associated diagnostic processes, it is also important to explore the patient perspectives expressed in the free-text comments.

Aim: To use the free-text data provided by patients completing the ICBP4 survey to augment the understanding of patients' perspectives of their diagnostic journey.

Design and setting: Qualitative analysis of the free-text data collected in Wales between October 2013 and December 2014 as part of the ICBP4 survey. Newly-diagnosed patients with either breast, ovarian, colorectal, or lung cancer were identified from registry data and then invited by their GPs to participate in the survey.

Method: A thematic framework was used to analyse the free-text comments provided at the end of the ICBP4 survey. Of the 905 patients who returned a questionnaire, 530 included comments.

Results: The free-text data provided information about patients' perspectives of the diagnostic journey. Analysis identified factors that acted as either barriers or facilitators at different stages of the diagnostic process. Some factors, such as screening, doctor-patient familiarity, and private treatment, acted as both barriers and facilitators depending on the context.

Conclusion: Factors identified in this study help to explain how existing models of cancer diagnosis (for example, the Pathways to Treatment Model) work in practice. It is important that clinicians are aware of how these factors may interact with individual clinical cases and either facilitate, or act as a barrier to, subsequent cancer diagnosis. Understanding and implementing this knowledge into clinical practice may result in quicker cancer diagnoses.

Keywords: Wales; early detection of cancer; patients; qualitative research; surveys and questionnaires.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. De Angelis R, Sant M, Coleman MP, et al. Cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE-5 — a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(1):23–34. - PubMed
    1. Richards MA. The size of the prize for earlier diagnosis of cancer in England. Br J Cancer. 2009;101(Suppl 2):125–129. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rubin G, Berendsen A, Crawford SM, et al. The expanding role of primary care in cancer control. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(12):1231–1272. - PubMed
    1. Emery JD, Shaw K, Williams B, et al. The role of primary care in early detection and follow-up of cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014;11(1):38–48. - PubMed
    1. Scott SE, Walter FM, Webster A, et al. The Model of Pathways to Treatment: conceptualization and integration with existing theory. Br J Health Psychol. 2013;18(1):45–65. - PubMed