Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jan 5;372(1711):20160054.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0054.

Do infants retain the statistics of a statistical learning experience? Insights from a developmental cognitive neuroscience perspective

Affiliations
Review

Do infants retain the statistics of a statistical learning experience? Insights from a developmental cognitive neuroscience perspective

Rebecca L Gómez. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Statistical structure abounds in language. Human infants show a striking capacity for using statistical learning (SL) to extract regularities in their linguistic environments, a process thought to bootstrap their knowledge of language. Critically, studies of SL test infants in the minutes immediately following familiarization, but long-term retention unfolds over hours and days, with almost no work investigating retention of SL. This creates a critical gap in the literature given that we know little about how single or multiple SL experiences translate into permanent knowledge. Furthermore, different memory systems with vastly different encoding and retention profiles emerge at different points in development, with the underlying memory system dictating the fidelity of the memory trace hours later. I describe the scant literature on retention of SL, the learning and retention properties of memory systems as they apply to SL, and the development of these memory systems. I propose that different memory systems support retention of SL in infant and adult learners, suggesting an explanation for the slow pace of natural language acquisition in infancy. I discuss the implications of developing memory systems for SL and suggest that we exercise caution in extrapolating from adult to infant properties of SL.This article is part of the themed issue 'New frontiers for statistical learning in the cognitive sciences'.

Keywords: brain development; infant learning; language acquisition; long-term retention; memory systems; statistical learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Saffran JR, Aslin RN, Newport EL. 1996. Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274, 1926–1928. (10.1126/science.274.5294.1926) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gomez RL, Gerken L. 1999. Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge. Cognition 70, 109–135. (10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00003-7) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Endress AD, Mehler J. 2009. The surprising power of statistical learning: when fragment knowledge leads to false memories of unheard words. J. Mem. Lang. 60, 351–367. (10.1016/j.jml.2008.10.003) - DOI
    1. Ferry AL, Fló A, Brusini P, Cattarossi L, Macagno F, Nespor M, Mehler J. 2015. On the edge of language acquisition: inherent constraints on encoding multisyllabic sequences in the neonate brain. Dev. Sci. 19, 488–503. (10.1111/desc.12323) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saksida A, Langus A, Nespor M. 2016. Co-occurrence statistics as a language-dependent cue for speech segmentation. Dev. Sci. (10.1111/desc.12390) - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources