Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016;9(1):40-48.
doi: 10.1080/17538068.2015.1126995. Epub 2016 Feb 5.

A pilot test of the acceptability and efficacy of narrative and non-narrative health education materials in a low health literacy population

Affiliations

A pilot test of the acceptability and efficacy of narrative and non-narrative health education materials in a low health literacy population

Meghan Bridgid Moran et al. J Commun Healthc. 2016.

Abstract

Although entertainment-education narratives are increasingly being used to communicate health information to a diversity of populations, there is limited evidence examining the use of narrative health education videos in low compared with adequate health literacy populations. There are also very few studies directly comparing narrative materials to more traditional, non-narrative materials. Because individuals with low health literacy are less likely than those with adequate health literacy to benefit from health communication interventions, it is especially important to develop an evidence base supporting the use of narrative health education materials in low literacy populations. This study extends knowledge on the use of narrative health education materials in populations with low health literacy by conducting a randomized trial comparing the acceptability and efficacy (knowledge gain) of two fact-equivalent films, one in a narrative and one in a non-narrative format, on individuals with adequate and low health literacy. This study finds that while both films were well-accepted and produced knowledge gains, the narrative film was more effective in this regard. This effect occurred regardless of health literacy level, indicating that narrative health communication materials are appropriate for individuals with low health literacy and do not exacerbate existing health disparities. These findings add to a small but growing body of evidence testing narrative health education materials in individuals with low health literacy, and provide new evidence supporting narrative, entertainment-education style video as a health communication tool to help reduce health literacy-related health disparities.

Keywords: Cervical cancer; Entertainment-education; HPV; Health communication; Health disparities; Health literacy; Knowledge; Narrative.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Still shots from the narrative and non-narrative videos.

References

    1. Kreuter MW, Green MC, Cappella JN, Slater MD, Wise ME, Storey D, et al. Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: a framework to guide research and application. Ann Behav Med. 2007;33:221–35. - PubMed
    1. Bollinger S, Kreuter MW. Real-time moment-to-moment emotional responses to narrative and informational breast cancer videos in African-American women. Health Educ Res. 2012;27:537–43. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Green MC. Narratives and cancer communication. J Commun. 2006;56:S163–183.
    1. McQueen A, Kreuter MW, Kalesan, Alcaraz KI. Understanding narrative effects: the impact of breast cancer survivor stories on message processing, attitudes, and beliefs among African American women. Health Psychol. 2011;30:674–82. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murphy ST, Frank LB, Chatterjee JS, et al. Narrative versus nonnarrative: the role of identification, transportation, and emotion in reducing health disparities. J Commun. 2013;63:116–37. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources