Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 2;12(1):19-26.
doi: 10.1080/15592294.2016.1252891. Epub 2016 Nov 22.

Epigenetic changes as prognostic predictors in endometrial carcinomas

Affiliations

Epigenetic changes as prognostic predictors in endometrial carcinomas

Sanja A Farkas et al. Epigenetics. .

Abstract

Endometrial carcinoma is one of the most frequent gynecological malignancies of the female. The diagnostic and prognostic markers for the high-risk subgroups with unfavorable prognosis are under intense debate worldwide, and, therefore, the aim of this study was to identify new potential DNA methylation markers for the high-risk groups. We used the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip to analyze the DNA methylation pattern and investigated its association with clinicopathological features important for defining the high-risk (FIGO-grade 3) and low-risk (FIGO-grade 1) groups of patients with endometrial cancer (n = 31 and n = 39, respectively). We identified specific DNA methylation signature in high-risk endometrial tumors, and potential molecular biomarker genes (TBX2, CHST11, and NID2) associated with unfavorable clinical predictive and prognostic factors.

Keywords: DNA methylation; FIGO grade; endometrial cancer; prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Heat map showing differentially methylated CpG sites with a β ≥ |0.3| in tumors of FIGO-grade 1 (blue) and FIGO-grade 3 (yellow).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Cancer-specific survival rate vs. methylation of gene TBX2 (cg07095230). Group 1: hypomethylated (≤ median value) and Group 2: hypermethylated (> median value).

References

    1. Saso S, Chatterjee J, Georgiou E, Ditri AM, Smith JR, Ghaem-Maghami S. Endometrial cancer. BMJ 2011; 343:d3954; PMID:21734165 - PubMed
    1. Bergman O, Hont G, Johansson E. Cancer i siffror. Johansson E, editor 2013.
    1. Sorbe B, Juresta C, Ahlin C. Natural history of recurrences in endometrial carcinoma. Oncol Lett 2014; 8(4):1800-6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rutgers JK. Update on pathology, staging and molecular pathology of endometrial (uterine corpus) adenocarcinoma. Future Oncol 2015; 11(23):3207-18; PMID:26551559; http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/fon.15.262. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Banno K, Kisu I, Yanokura M, Masuda K, Ueki A, Kobayashi Y, Susumu N, Aoki D. Epigenetics and genetics in endometrial cancer: new carcinogenic mechanisms and relationship with clinical practice. Epigenomics 2012; 4(2):147-62; PMID:22449187; http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/epi.12.13 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances