Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Apr;100(4):655-666.
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.11.008. Epub 2016 Nov 13.

Breaking bad news to patients with cancer: A randomized control trial of a brief communication skills training module incorporating the stories and preferences of actual patients

James Gorniewicz  1 , Michael Floyd  2 , Koyamangalath Krishnan  3 , Thomas W Bishop  2 , Fred Tudiver  2 , Forrest Lang  2
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Breaking bad news to patients with cancer: A randomized control trial of a brief communication skills training module incorporating the stories and preferences of actual patients

James Gorniewicz et al. Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: This study tested the effectiveness of a brief, learner-centered, breaking bad news (BBN) communication skills training module using objective evaluation measures.

Methods: This randomized control study (N=66) compared intervention and control groups of students (n=28) and residents' (n=38) objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) performance of communication skills using Common Ground Assessment and Breaking Bad News measures.

Results: Follow-up performance scores of intervention group students improved significantly regarding BBN (colon cancer (CC), p=0.007, r=-0.47; breast cancer (BC), p=0.003, r=-0.53), attention to patient responses after BBN (CC, p<0.001, r=-0.74; BC, p=0.001, r=-0.65), and addressing feelings (BC, p=0.006, r=-0.48). At CC follow-up assessment, performance scores of intervention group residents improved significantly regarding BBN (p=0.004, r=-0.43), communication related to emotions (p=0.034, r=-0.30), determining patient's readiness to proceed after BBN and communication preferences (p=0.041, r=-0.28), active listening (p=0.011, r=-0.37), addressing feelings (p<0.001, r=-0.65), and global interview performance (p=0.001, r=-0.51).

Conclusion: This brief BBN training module is an effective method of improving BBN communication skills among medical students and residents.

Practice implications: Implementation of this brief individualized training module within health education programs could lead to improved communication skills and patient care.

Keywords: Breaking bad news; Cancer; Common ground assessment; Communication skills training; Education; Empathy; Narrative; Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE); Qualitative; Stories.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Breaking Bad News Skills Rating Form Checklist (BBN Skills)
Figure 2
Figure 2. Common Ground Assessment
Figure 2
Figure 2. Common Ground Assessment
Figure 3
Figure 3. Data Collection Timeline and Demographics
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Oken D. What to tell cancer patients - a study of medical attitudes. J Amer Med Assoc. 1961;175:1120–8. - PubMed
    1. Friedman HJ. Physician management of dying patients: an exploration. Psychiatry Med. 1970;1:295–305. - PubMed
    1. Novack DH, Plumer R, Smith RL, Ochitill H, Morrow GR, Bennett JM. Changes in physicians' attitudes toward telling the cancer patient. J Amer Med Assoc. 1979;241:897–900. - PubMed
    1. Fallowfield L, Jenkins V. Communicating sad, bad, and difficult news in medicine. Lancet. 2004;263:312–9. - PubMed
    1. Schmid Mast M, Kindlimann A, Langewitz W. Recipients' perspective on breaking bad news: how you put it really makes a difference. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;58:244–51. - PubMed

Publication types