Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 8:7:1769.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01769. eCollection 2016.

Distribution of Native Lactic Acid Bacteria in Wineries of Queretaro, Mexico and Their Resistance to Wine-Like Conditions

Affiliations

Distribution of Native Lactic Acid Bacteria in Wineries of Queretaro, Mexico and Their Resistance to Wine-Like Conditions

Dalia E Miranda-Castilleja et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

Native lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are capable of growing during winemaking, thereby strongly affecting wine quality. The species of LAB present in musts, wines during malolactic fermentation (MLF), and barrels/filters were investigated in wineries from the emerging wine region of Queretaro, México using multiplex PCR and culture. The resistance to wine-like conditions (WLC): ethanol (10, 12, and 13%), SO2 (30 mg⋅l-1), and low pH (3.5) of native LAB strains was also studied. Five species were detected within 61 samples obtained: Oenococcus oeni, Lactobacillus plantarum, Pediococcus parvulus, Lactobacillus hilgardi, and Lactobacillus brevis. Four species (excepting L. brevis) were found in must; O. oeni and P. parvulus were ubiquitous in wine and L. plantarum and L. brevis were mainly present at the initial stage of MLF, while L. hilgardii was mostly detected at the advanced stage. Furthermore, some species detected in barrel/filter, prove them to be hazardous reservoirs. From 822 LAB isolates, only 119 resisted WLC with 10% ethanol; the number of strains able to grow in WLC with 13% ethanol decreased approximately by 50%, O. oeni being the most versatile species with 65% of resistant isolates, while Lactobacillus spp. and P. parvulus were the most strongly affected, especially those recovered from barrel/filter, with less than 10% of resistant isolates. This study evidences the presence of local strains able to be used as starter cultures, and also enabled the assessment of the risks derived from the presence of spoilage LAB strains resistant to WLC.

Keywords: Oenococcus oeni; malolactic fermentation; multiplex PCR; starter cultures; wine spoilage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Population of lactic acid bacteria in samples of must, barrel/filter and wine throughout three stages of malolactic fermentation: I beginning, M intermediate, A advanced; obtained from wineries (A–D). Kruskal–Wallis analysis and Dunn’s post hoc test among wineries, MFL stages and sample type. The box indicates the 25th and 75th percentiles, line across the box shows the median value and the whiskers caps represent the maximum and minimum values.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Proportion of isolates of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) species capable of growing in a synthetic medium similar to wine (SW) with SO2 30 mg l-1 pH 3.5 and different ethanol concentrations (% v/v, x-axis), from different wineries (horizontal boxes, A–D) and types of samples taken (vertical boxes). The number of resistant isolates is indicated above the column.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Identification of LAB isolates (lines 2–5) and detection of species present in wine-related (6–9) samples using multiplex PCR. The origin of the sample is indicated above as follows: The first letter corresponds to the type of sample: G, must; F, banel/filter; W, wine. The second letter corresponds to the winery: A, B, C, or D. The first line corresponds to the molecular weight marker TrackitTM 100 bp (Invitrogen). Moreover, the species corresponding to that molecular weight is specified (Petri et al., 2013).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arroyo-López F. N., Salvadó Z., Tronchoni J., Guillamón J. M., Barrio E., Querol A. (2010). Susceptibility and resistance to ethanol in Saccharomyces strains isolated from wild and fermentative environments. Yeast 27 1005–1015. 10.1002/yea.1809 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Asociación de Vitivinicultores de Querétaro [AVQ] (2011). Estudio de impacto productivo de un viñedo. Querétaro: Asociación de Vitivinicultores de Querétaro, 111.
    1. Bae S., Fleet G. H., Heard G. M. (2006). Lactic acid bacteria associated with wine grapes from several Australian vineyards. J. Appl. Microbiol. 100 712–727. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02890.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barata A., Malfeito-Ferreira M., Loureiro V. (2012). The microbial ecology of wine grape berries. In. J. Food Microbiol. 153 243–259. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.11.025 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bartowsky E. J. (2009). Bacterial spoilage of wine and approaches to minimize it. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 48 149–156. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02505.x - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources