Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 May 26;16(3):033506.
doi: 10.1088/1468-6996/16/3/033506. eCollection 2015 Jun.

Recent progress in oxynitride photocatalysts for visible-light-driven water splitting

Affiliations
Review

Recent progress in oxynitride photocatalysts for visible-light-driven water splitting

Tsuyoshi Takata et al. Sci Technol Adv Mater. .

Abstract

Photocatalytic water splitting into hydrogen and oxygen is a method to directly convert light energy into storable chemical energy, and has received considerable attention for use in large-scale solar energy utilization. Particulate semiconductors are generally used as photocatalysts, and semiconductor properties such as bandgap, band positions, and photocarrier mobility can heavily impact photocatalytic performance. The design of active photocatalysts has been performed with the consideration of such semiconductor properties. Photocatalysts have a catalytic aspect in addition to a semiconductor one. The ability to control surface redox reactions in order to efficiently produce targeted reactants is also important for photocatalysts. Over the past few decades, various photocatalysts for water splitting have been developed, and a recent main concern has been the development of visible-light sensitive photocatalysts for water splitting. This review introduces the study of water-splitting photocatalysts, with a focus on recent progress in visible-light induced overall water splitting on oxynitride photocatalysts. Various strategies for designing efficient photocatalysts for water splitting are also discussed herein.

Keywords: cocatalyst; oxynitride; photocatalyst; semiconductor; visible light; water splitting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Schematic models of (a) photoelectrochemical and (b) photocatalytic water splitting.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Basic principles of water splitting on a semiconductor photocatalyst.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Energy diagram of photocatalytic water splitting.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Schematic of the apparatus for photocatalytic water splitting.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Strategy for designing visible-light-sensitive photocatalysts for water splitting.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
UV-visible diffuse reflectance spectrum of β-Ge3N4.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Time course of H2 and O2 evolution on RuO2-loaded β-Ge3N4 under UV light irradiation. Catalyst 0.5 g, aqueous H2SO4 solution (pH = 0) 390 ml, inner-irradiation-type quartz reaction cell, high-pressure mercury lamp (450 W).
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
XRD patterns for GaN:ZnO solid solutions with various compositions. (a) GaN (ref), (b) GaN:ZnO (Zn 3.4 at%), (c) GaN:ZnO (Zn 6.4 at%), (d) GaN:ZnO (Zn 13.3 at%), and (e) ZnO. (Reproduced with permission from [56]. Copyright 2005 American Chemical Society).
Figure 9.
Figure 9.
UV-visible diffuse reflectance spectra of GaN:ZnO solid solutions with various compositions. (a) GaN (ref), (b) GaN:ZnO (Zn 3.4 at%), (c) GaN:ZnO (Zn 6.4 at%), (d) GaN:ZnO (Zn 13.3 at%), and (e) ZnO. (Reproduced with permission from [56]. Copyright 2005 American Chemical Society).
Figure 10.
Figure 10.
Time courses of H2 and O2 evolution on RuO2-loaded GaN:ZnO under (a) UV light irradiation and (b) visible light irradiation. Catalyst 0.3 g, aqueous H2SO4 solution (pH = 3) 390 ml, inner-irradiation-type Pyrex reaction cell, with and without an aqueous NaNO2 solution filter, high-pressure mercury lamp (450 W). (●) H2, (○) O2, (△) N2. (Reproduced with permission from [56]. Copyright 2005 American Chemical Society).
Figure 11.
Figure 11.
Linear-sweep voltammograms for (a) bare and (b) Cr2O3-coated Rh electrodes in 0.5 M Na2SO4 aqueous solution adjusted to pH 3.6 with H2SO4 under Ar (dashed line) and O2 bubbling (solid line) (scan rate, 5 mV s−1). (Reproduced with permission from [65]. Copyright 2009 American Chemical Society).
Figure 12.
Figure 12.
Schematic model of the function of metal-core/Cr2O3-shell cocatalyst for the promotion of overall water splitting.
Figure 13.
Figure 13.
Crystal structures of TaON (a), Ta3N5 (b), and perovskite oxynitride (c).
Figure 14.
Figure 14.
Basic principles of photocatalytic reactions in the presence of sacrificial reagents.
Figure 15.
Figure 15.
Crystal structures of LaTaON2, LaMg2/3Ta1/3O3, and LaMgxTa1−xO1+3xN2−3x.
Figure 16.
Figure 16.
XRD patterns (a) and UV-visible diffuse reflectance spectra (b) for LaMgxTa1−xO1+3xN2−3x.
Figure 17.
Figure 17.
Schematic of band engineering by compositional tuning.
Figure 18.
Figure 18.
Gas evolution during water splitting on the RhyCr2−yO3/LaTaON2 (a) and on RhyCr2−yO3/LaMg1/3Ta2/3O2N (b). Catalyst 0.2 g, pure water 400 ml, inner-irradiation-type Pyrex reaction cell, high-pressure mercury lamp (450 W). (●) H2, (○) O2, (▲) N2.
Figure 19.
Figure 19.
Gas evolution during water splitting on TiO2/RhyCr2−yO3/ LaMg1/3Ta2/3O2N(a) and on TiO2/SiO2/RhyCr2−yO3/LaMg1/3Ta2/3O2N(b) under UV+visible light irradiation and visible light irradiation alone. Catalyst 0.2 g, pure water 400 ml, inner-irradiation-type Pyrex reaction cell, with and without an aqueous NaNO2 solution filter, high-pressure mercury lamp (450 W). (●) H2, (○) O2, (▲) N2.
Figure 20.
Figure 20.
Schematic of the strategy for the surface coating of photocatalyst to achieve overall water splitting.

References

    1. Fujishima A. and Honda K. Nature. 1972;238:37. doi: 10.1038/238037a0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pinaud B A. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013;6:1983. doi: 10.1039/c3ee40831k. - DOI
    1. Domen K, Knodo J N, Hara M. and Takata T. Bull Chem. Soc. Japan. 2000;73:1307. doi: 10.1246/bcsj.73.1307. - DOI
    1. Domen K, Knodo J N, Hara M, Takata T, Kudo A, Kobayashi H. and Inoue Y. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2001;18:862. doi: 10.1007/BF02705609. - DOI
    1. Kudo A. and Miseki Y. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009;38:253. doi: 10.1039/B800489G. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources