Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 May;46(4):456-467.
doi: 10.1007/s13280-016-0844-z. Epub 2016 Nov 22.

A review of ecosystem service benefits from wild bees across social contexts

Affiliations
Review

A review of ecosystem service benefits from wild bees across social contexts

Denise Margaret S Matias et al. Ambio. 2017 May.

Abstract

In order to understand the role of wild bees in both social and ecological systems, we conducted a quantitative and qualitative review of publications dealing with wild bees and the benefits they provide in social contexts. We classified publications according to several attributes such as services and benefits derived from wild bees, types of bee-human interactions, recipients of direct benefits, social contexts where wild bees are found, and sources of changes to the bee-human system. We found that most of the services and benefits from wild bees are related to food, medicine, and pollination. We also found that wild bees directly provide benefits to communities to a greater extent than individuals. In the social contexts where they are found, wild bees occupy a central role. Several drivers of change affect bee-human systems, ranging from environmental to political drivers. These are the areas where we recommend making interventions for conserving the bee-human system.

Keywords: Community; Ecosystem cascade framework; Livelihoods framework; Social–ecological systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Increase in publications. There is a general trend of increase in publications on wild bees in social contexts during the last decade. The shaded area is the 95% confidence region of the nonlinear regression
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Research mobility of the Northern Hemisphere. Most of the (first) authors from the Northern Hemisphere conducted their studies outside of their own region. European first authors conducted research in Asia, Africa, and Latin America while North American first authors conducted research in all regions except Australia and the Middle East. First authors from Africa (with the exception of one author with dual affiliation with Asia), Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East conducted research only in their own regions
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Domination of ecology and anthropology. Most of the publications on wild bees fall within the fields of ecology, followed by anthropology
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Comparison of wild bee services identified in publications that used either an ecosystem cascade (pink) or livelihoods (green) framework. Publications that used a livelihoods framework identified honey and bee products as the main services that wild bees provide. Publications that used an ecosystem cascade framework identified pollen and the bees themselves as main services
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Comparison of benefits derived from wild bee services identified in publications that used either an ecosystem cascade (pink) or livelihoods (green) framework. Material and food benefits are mostly identified in publications that used a livelihoods framework. Medicine, pollination, and cultural benefits dominate in publications that used an ecosystem cascade framework
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Wild bees in social contexts. Humans interact directly with bees during bee product harvest, beekeeping, or bee hunting. Indirectly, bees become involved in social contexts when their products are used or traded

References

    1. Allsopp MH, de Lange WJ, Veldtman R. Valuing insect pollination services with cost of replacement. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e3128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003128. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersson E, Barthel S, Ahrné K. Measuring social–ecological dynamics behind the generation of ecosystem services. Ecological Applications. 2007;17:1267–1278. doi: 10.1890/06-1116.1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Banaszak-Cibicka W, Żmihorski M. Wild bees along an urban gradient: Winners and losers. Journal of Insect Conservation. 2012;16:331–343. doi: 10.1007/s10841-011-9419-2. - DOI
    1. Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters. 2009;12:1394–1404. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berkes F, Folke C. Back to the future: Ecosystem dynamics and local knowledge. In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS, editors. Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2002. pp. 121–146.

LinkOut - more resources