Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb;47(2):178-185.
doi: 10.1007/s00247-016-3751-3. Epub 2016 Nov 23.

Imaging button battery ingestions and insertions in children: a 15-year single-center review

Affiliations

Imaging button battery ingestions and insertions in children: a 15-year single-center review

Brian S Pugmire et al. Pediatr Radiol. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Recent studies have shown an increase in morbidity associated with button battery ingestions in children.

Objective: To perform a comprehensive, imaging-focused review of all patients with confirmed button battery ingestions/insertions imaged at our institution in the last 15 years.

Materials and methods: Radiology reports from Jan. 1, 2000, to July 12, 2015, were searched for the terms "battery" and "batteries." Confirmed cases of battery ingestion/insertion for which images were available were reviewed. Cases were reviewed for imaging studies performed, imaging findings, patient demographics, clinical history and management. Two pediatric gastroenterologists reviewed endoscopic images and graded mucosal injuries in selected cases.

Results: Two hundred seventy-six cases were reviewed. All patients were imaged with radiography, 19 with fluoroscopy (6.8%), and 4 with CT (1.4%). Batteries retained in the esophagus (n = 27, 9.8%) were larger in diameter on average than those that had passed distally (22.1 ± 3.3 mm vs. 13.7 ± 1.6 mm, P<0.0001). Battery diameter ≥20 mm was associated with esophageal impaction (P<0.0001) and higher grade esophageal injury (P<0.0001). Mean battery diameter was greater for patients with grade 1 or higher mucosal injury than for patients with no mucosal injury (22.1 ± 2.1 mm vs. 14.7 ± 4.5 mm, P<0.0001). Sixteen percent (4/25) of patients with grade ≥1 esophageal injury had batteries in the stomach on initial imaging. Five patients (1.8%) had serious clinical complications (e.g., esophageal perforation, tracheoesophageal fistula).

Conclusion: Button batteries >20mm in diameter warrant increased clinical scrutiny due to higher likelihood and severity of injury. Implementation of recent pediatric gastroenterology societal guidelines will likely lead to a substantial increase in the number of CT and MRI examinations.

Keywords: Button batteries; Children; Computed tomography; Esophagus; Foreign body; Gastrointestinal tract; Radiography.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012 Aug 31;61(34):661-6 - PubMed
    1. J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Mar;44(3):644-7 - PubMed
    1. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Sep;77(9):1392-9 - PubMed
    1. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2016 Jan;26(1):99-118 - PubMed
    1. Pediatrics. 2010 Jun;125(6):1168-77 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources