Water-deficit and fungal infection can differentially affect the production of different classes of defense compounds in two host pines of mountain pine beetle
- PMID: 27881799
- DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpw105
Water-deficit and fungal infection can differentially affect the production of different classes of defense compounds in two host pines of mountain pine beetle
Abstract
Bark beetles are important agents of tree mortality in conifer forests and their interaction with trees is influenced by host defense chemicals, such as monoterpenes and phenolics. Since mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins) has expanded its host range from lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Doug. ex Loud. (var. latifolia Engelm.))-dominated forests to the novel jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) forests in western Canada, studies investigating the jack pine suitability as a host for this beetle have exclusively focused on monoterpenes, and whether phenolics affect jack pine suitability to mountain pine beetle and its symbiotic fungus Grosmannia clavigera is unknown. We investigated the phenolic and monoterpene composition in phloem and foliage of jack and lodgepole pines, and their subsequent change in response to water deficit and G. clavigera inoculation treatments. In lodgepole pine phloem, water deficit treatment inhibited the accumulation of both the total and richness of phenolics, but had no effect on total monoterpene production or richness. Fungal infection also inhibited the total phenolic production and had no effect on phenolic or monoterpene richness, but increased total monoterpene synthesis by 71%. In jack pine phloem, water deficit treatment reduced phenolic production, but had no effect on phenolic or monoterpene richness or total monoterpenes. Fungal infection did not affect phenolic or monoterpene production. Lesions of both species contained lower phenolics but higher monoterpenes than non-infected phloem in the same tree. In both species, richness of monoterpenes and phenolics was greater in non-infected phloem than in lesions. We conclude that monoterpenes seem to be a critical component of induced defenses against G. clavigera in both jack and lodgepole pines; however, a lack of increased monoterpene response to fungal infection is an important evolutionary factor defining jack pine suitability to the mountain pine beetle invasion in western Canada.
Keywords: Canadian boreal forest; chemical defenses; constitutive and induced plant defenses; invasion dynamics; secondary compounds of phloem and foliage.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Similar articles
-
Rapid monoterpene induction promotes the susceptibility of a novel host pine to mountain pine beetle colonization but not to beetle-vectored fungi.Tree Physiol. 2017 Dec 1;37(12):1597-1610. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpx089. Tree Physiol. 2017. PMID: 28985375
-
Influence of water deficit on the molecular responses of Pinus contorta × Pinus banksiana mature trees to infection by the mountain pine beetle fungal associate, Grosmannia clavigera.Tree Physiol. 2014 Nov;34(11):1220-39. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpt101. Epub 2013 Dec 5. Tree Physiol. 2014. PMID: 24319029 Free PMC article.
-
A Native Parasitic Plant Systemically Induces Resistance in Jack Pine to a Fungal Symbiont of Invasive Mountain Pine Beetle.J Chem Ecol. 2017 May;43(5):506-518. doi: 10.1007/s10886-017-0845-9. Epub 2017 May 2. J Chem Ecol. 2017. PMID: 28466378
-
Phytochemicals as mediators for host range expansion of a native invasive forest insect herbivore.New Phytol. 2019 Feb;221(3):1268-1278. doi: 10.1111/nph.15467. Epub 2018 Oct 6. New Phytol. 2019. PMID: 30291808 Review.
-
Mountain Pine Beetle Epidemic: An Interplay of Terpenoids in Host Defense and Insect Pheromones.Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2022 May 20;73:475-494. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-070921-103617. Epub 2022 Feb 7. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2022. PMID: 35130442 Review.
Cited by
-
Naïve Pine Terpene Response to the Mountain Pine Beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) through the Seasons.J Chem Ecol. 2023 Jun;49(5-6):299-312. doi: 10.1007/s10886-023-01418-1. Epub 2023 Mar 16. J Chem Ecol. 2023. PMID: 36929332
-
Factors governing outbreak dynamics in a forest intensively managed for mountain pine beetle.Sci Rep. 2020 May 5;10(1):7601. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63388-8. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 32372031 Free PMC article.
-
Ectomycorrhizal fungal species differentially affect the induced defensive chemistry of lodgepole pine.Oecologia. 2018 Oct;188(2):395-404. doi: 10.1007/s00442-018-4231-2. Epub 2018 Jul 21. Oecologia. 2018. PMID: 30032438
-
A Pine in Distress: How Infection by Different Pathogenic Fungi Affect Lodgepole Pine Chemical Defenses.Microb Ecol. 2023 Nov;86(4):2666-2673. doi: 10.1007/s00248-023-02272-0. Epub 2023 Jul 24. Microb Ecol. 2023. PMID: 37486583
-
Successful Colonization of Lodgepole Pine Trees by Mountain Pine Beetle Increased Monoterpene Production and Exhausted Carbohydrate Reserves.J Chem Ecol. 2018 Feb;44(2):209-214. doi: 10.1007/s10886-017-0922-0. Epub 2018 Jan 4. J Chem Ecol. 2018. PMID: 29302834
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources