Cost Effectiveness of Apixaban versus Warfarin or Aspirin for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Greek Perspective
- PMID: 27882517
- DOI: 10.1007/s40256-016-0204-1
Cost Effectiveness of Apixaban versus Warfarin or Aspirin for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Greek Perspective
Abstract
Background: Strokes attributed to atrial fibrillation (AF) represent a major cause of adult disability and a great burden to society and healthcare systems.
Objectives: Our objective was to assess the cost effectiveness of apixaban, a direct acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC), versus warfarin or aspirin for patients with AF in the Greek healthcare setting.
Methods: We used a previously published Markov model to simulate clinical events for patients with AF treated with apixaban, the vitamin K antagonist (VKA) warfarin, or aspirin. Clinical events (ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, other major bleed, clinically relevant non-major bleed, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular [CV] hospitalizations) were modeled using efficacy data from the ARISTOTLE and AVERROES clinical trials. The cohort's baseline characteristics also sourced from these trials. Among VKA-suitable patients, 64.7% were men with a mean age of 70 years and average CHADS2 (cardiac failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, stroke2) score of 2.1, whereas 58.5% of VKA-unsuitable patients were men with a mean age of 70 years and a CHADS2 score of 2.0. A panel of experts (cardiologists and internists) provided information on the resource use associated with the management of AF. Cost calculations reflect the local clinical setting and a third-party payer perspective (€, discounted at 3%).
Results: Based on a simulation of 1000 VKA-suitable patients over a lifetime horizon, the use of apixaban versus warfarin resulted in 26 fewer strokes and systemic embolisms in total, 65 fewer bleeds, 41 fewer myocardial infarctions, and 29 fewer CV-related deaths, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €14,478/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). For VKA-unsuitable patients, apixaban versus aspirin resulted in 72 fewer strokes and systemic embolisms and 57 fewer CV-related deaths, with an ICER of €7104/QALY. Sensitivity analyses indicated that results were robust.
Conclusions: Based on the present analysis, apixaban represents a cost-effective treatment option versus warfarin and aspirin for the prevention of stroke in patients with AF from a Greek healthcare payer perspective over a lifetime horizon.
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness of apixaban vs. current standard of care for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation.Eur Heart J. 2014 Jul 21;35(28):1897-906. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu006. Epub 2014 Feb 9. Eur Heart J. 2014. PMID: 24513791 Free PMC article.
-
Stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation in France: comparative cost-effectiveness of new oral anticoagulants (apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban), warfarin, and aspirin.J Med Econ. 2014 Aug;17(8):587-98. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.923891. Epub 2014 May 29. J Med Econ. 2014. PMID: 24831811
-
Cost-effectiveness of apixaban versus warfarin and aspirin in Sweden for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation.Thromb Res. 2014 Aug;134(2):278-87. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.05.027. Epub 2014 May 26. Thromb Res. 2014. PMID: 24935675
-
Novel oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: focus on apixaban.Adv Ther. 2012 Jun;29(6):491-507. doi: 10.1007/s12325-012-0026-8. Epub 2012 Jun 7. Adv Ther. 2012. PMID: 22684583 Review.
-
Apixaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a review of the clinical trial evidence.Hosp Pract (1995). 2011 Oct;39(4):7-16. doi: 10.3810/hp.2011.10.918. Hosp Pract (1995). 2011. PMID: 22056819 Review.
Cited by
-
Cost-effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulant vs. Warfarin Among Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Intermediate Stroke Risk.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 11;9:849474. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.849474. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 35479283 Free PMC article.
-
Economic evaluation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Evid Based Med. 2022 Aug;27(4):215-223. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111634. Epub 2021 Oct 11. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2022. PMID: 34635480 Free PMC article.
-
Non-valvular atrial fibrillation: impact of apixaban on patient outcomes.Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2017 Nov 3;8:121-131. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S117549. eCollection 2017. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2017. PMID: 29138609 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Factors influencing the cost-effectiveness of novel oral anticoagulants compared to vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review.Front Pharmacol. 2025 Mar 28;16:1441754. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1441754. eCollection 2025. Front Pharmacol. 2025. PMID: 40223938 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical