Mastery-Based Virtual Reality Robotic Simulation Curriculum: The First Step Toward Operative Robotic Proficiency
- PMID: 27884677
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.10.015
Mastery-Based Virtual Reality Robotic Simulation Curriculum: The First Step Toward Operative Robotic Proficiency
Abstract
Objective: Hepatobiliary surgery is a highly complex, low-volume specialty with long learning curves necessary to achieve optimal outcomes. This creates significant challenges in both training and measuring surgical proficiency. We hypothesize that a virtual reality curriculum with mastery-based simulation is a valid tool to train fellows toward operative proficiency. This study evaluates the content and predictive validity of robotic simulation curriculum as a first step toward developing a comprehensive, proficiency-based pathway.
Design: A mastery-based simulation curriculum was performed in a virtual reality environment. A pretest/posttest experimental design used both virtual reality and inanimate environments to evaluate improvement. Participants self-reported previous robotic experience and assessed the curriculum by rating modules based on difficulty and utility.
Setting: This study was conducted at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (Pittsburgh, PA), a tertiary care academic teaching hospital.
Participants: A total of 17 surgical oncology fellows enrolled in the curriculum, 16 (94%) completed.
Results: Of 16 fellows who completed the curriculum, 4 fellows (25%) achieved mastery on all 24 modules; on average, fellows mastered 86% of the modules. Following curriculum completion, individual test scores improved (p < 0.0001). An average of 2.4 attempts was necessary to master each module (range: 1-17). Median time spent completing the curriculum was 4.2 hours (range: 1.1-6.6). Total 8 (50%) fellows continued practicing modules beyond mastery. Survey results show that "needle driving" and "endowrist 2" modules were perceived as most difficult although "needle driving" modules were most useful. Overall, 15 (94%) fellows perceived improvement in robotic skills after completing the curriculum.
Conclusions: In a cohort of board-certified general surgeons who are novices in robotic surgery, a mastery-based simulation curriculum demonstrated internal validity with overall score improvement. Time to complete the curriculum was manageable.
Keywords: Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; Professionalism; mastery-based curriculum; robotic simulation; surgical education; surgical proficiency.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Similar articles
-
Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy Biotissue Curriculum has Validity and Improves Technical Performance for Surgical Oncology Fellows.J Surg Educ. 2017 Nov-Dec;74(6):1057-1065. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.05.016. Epub 2017 Jun 1. J Surg Educ. 2017. PMID: 28578981
-
Feasibility, effectiveness and transferability of a novel mastery-based virtual reality robotic training platform for general surgery residents.Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7279-7287. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09106-z. Epub 2022 Feb 22. Surg Endosc. 2022. PMID: 35194662 Free PMC article.
-
A Comparison of Robotic Simulation Performance on Basic Virtual Reality Skills: Simulator Subjective Versus Objective Assessment Tools.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Nov-Dec;24(7):1184-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.019. Epub 2017 Jul 27. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28757439 Clinical Trial.
-
Towards standardized robotic surgery in gastrointestinal oncology.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Nov;402(7):1003-1014. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1623-4. Epub 2017 Sep 27. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017. PMID: 28956165 Review.
-
A comprehensive review of robotic surgery curriculum and training for residents, fellows, and postgraduate surgical education.Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):361-367. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06775-1. Epub 2019 Apr 5. Surg Endosc. 2020. PMID: 30953199 Review.
Cited by
-
Will It Play in Peoria? A Pilot Study of a Robotic Skills Curriculum for Surgical Oncology Fellows.Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;28(11):6273-6282. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09913-z. Epub 2021 Mar 31. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33791900 Free PMC article.
-
How to integrate robotic training in surgical residency? An example of a 2-week robotic rotation.J Robot Surg. 2024 May 28;18(1):225. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01977-9. J Robot Surg. 2024. PMID: 38805107
-
Technology Acceptance Model in Medical Education: Systematic Review.JMIR Med Educ. 2025 Jul 16;11:e67873. doi: 10.2196/67873. JMIR Med Educ. 2025. PMID: 40668663 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Is there a need for a technical certification system for gynecological robotic surgery? Questionnaire survey of members of the Japan Society of Gynecologic and Obstetric Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive Therapy.J Robot Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):1125-1131. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01520-8. Epub 2023 Jan 9. J Robot Surg. 2023. PMID: 36617623 Free PMC article.
-
From the simulation lab to the operating room: simulation performance predicts intraoperative performance in robotic gastrojejunostomy.Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5967-5973. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11035-y. Epub 2024 Jul 29. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 39075312
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources