Technical description of oblique lateral interbody fusion at L1-L5 (OLIF25) and at L5-S1 (OLIF51) and evaluation of complication and fusion rates
- PMID: 27884744
- DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.10.026
Technical description of oblique lateral interbody fusion at L1-L5 (OLIF25) and at L5-S1 (OLIF51) and evaluation of complication and fusion rates
Abstract
Background context: The oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) procedure is aimed at mitigating some of the challenges seen with traditional anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), and allows for interbody fusion at L1-S1.
Purpose: The study aimed to describe the OLIF technique and assess the complication and fusion rates.
Study design: This is a retrospective cohort study.
Patient sample: The sample is composed of 137 patients who underwent OLIF procedure.
Outcome measures: The outcome measures were adverse events within 6 months of surgery: infection, symptomatic pseudarthrosis, hardware failure, vascular injury, perioperative blood transfusion, ureteral injury, bowel injury, renal injury, prolonged postoperative ileus (more than 3 days), incisional hernia, pseudohernia, reoperation, neurologic deficits (weakness, numbness, paresthesia), hip flexion pain, retrograde ejaculation, sympathectomy affecting lower extremities, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, pneumonia, and cerebrovascular accident. The outcome measures also include fusion and subsidence rates based on computed tomography (CT) done at 6 months postoperatively.
Methods: Retrospective chart review of 150 consecutive patients was performed to examine the complications associated with OLIF at L1-L5 (OLIF25), OLIF at L5-S1 (OLIF51), and OLIF at L1-L5 combined with OLIF at L5-S1 (OLIF25+OLIF51). Only patients who had at least 6 months of postoperative follow-up, including CT scan at 6 months after surgery, were included. Independent radiology review of CT data was performed to assess fusion and subsidence rates at 6 months.
Results: A total of 137 patients underwent fusion at 340 levels. An overall complication rate of 11.7% was seen. The most common complications were subsidence (4.4%), postoperative ileus (2.9%), and vascular injury (2.9%). Ileus and vascular injuries were only seen in cases including OLIF51. No patient suffered neurologic injury. No cases of ureteral injury, sympathectomy affecting the lower extremities, or visceral injury were seen. Successful fusion was seen at 97.9% of surgical levels.
Conclusions: Oblique lateral interbody fusion is a safe procedure at L1-L5 as well as L5-S1. The complication profile appears acceptable when compared with LLIF and ALIF. The oblique trajectory mitigates psoas muscle and lumbosacral plexus-related complications seen with the lateral transpsoas approach. Furthermore, there is a high fusion rate based on CT data at 6 months.
Keywords: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF); CT fusion rates; Complication rates; Direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF); Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF); Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF); Minimally invasive lumbar fusion; Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF); Oblique lateral retroperitoneal approach.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Similar articles
-
The Oblique Anterolateral Approach to the Lumbar Spine Provides Access to the Lumbar Spine With Few Early Complications.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Sep;474(9):2020-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4883-3. Epub 2016 May 9. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016. PMID: 27160744 Free PMC article.
-
Mini-open oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) approach for multi-level discectomy and fusion involving L5-S1: Preliminary experience.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Apr;103(2):295-299. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.11.016. Epub 2017 Jan 12. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017. PMID: 28089666
-
The anterior-to-psoas approach for interbody fusion at the L5-S1 segment: clinical and radiological outcomes.Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Sep;49(3):E14. doi: 10.3171/2020.6.FOCUS20335. Neurosurg Focus. 2020. PMID: 32871565
-
Technical and Conceptual Review on the L5-S1 Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Surgery (OLIF51).Spine Surg Relat Res. 2020 Jun 18;5(1):1-9. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2020-0086. eCollection 2021. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2020. PMID: 33575488 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Aspects, Operative Outcomes, and Complications.World Neurosurg. 2017 Feb;98:113-123. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.074. Epub 2016 Oct 21. World Neurosurg. 2017. PMID: 27777161 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of mini-open, anteroinferior psoas approach and mini-open, direct lateral transpsoas approach for lumbar burst fractures: A retrospective cohort study.Front Surg. 2022 Oct 14;9:995410. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.995410. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 36311940 Free PMC article.
-
Oblique lateral interbody fusion in heterogenous lumbar diseases: Anterolateral screw fixation vs. posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation - A single center experience.Front Surg. 2022 Dec 26;9:989372. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.989372. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 36632522 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of transfacet and pedicle screws in oblique lateral interbody fusion for single-level degenerative lumbar spine diseases: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis.BMC Surg. 2022 Dec 15;22(1):429. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01880-w. BMC Surg. 2022. PMID: 36522754 Free PMC article.
-
Usefulness of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 Level Compared to Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2020 Nov;63(6):723-729. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2018.0215. Epub 2019 Jul 15. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2020. PMID: 31295977 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Sep 18;22(1):802. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04687-7. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021. PMID: 34537023 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources