Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 24;18(11):e312.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.6399.

Mobile Apps in Oncology: A Survey on Health Care Professionals' Attitude Toward Telemedicine, mHealth, and Oncological Apps

Kerstin A Kessel  1   2 , Marco M E Vogel  1   2 , Friederike Schmidt-Graf  3 , Stephanie E Combs  1   2
Affiliations

Mobile Apps in Oncology: A Survey on Health Care Professionals' Attitude Toward Telemedicine, mHealth, and Oncological Apps

Kerstin A Kessel et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Mobile apps are an evolving trend in the medical field. To date, few apps in an oncological context exist.

Objective: The aim was to analyze the attitude of health care professionals (HCPs) toward telemedicine, mHealth, and mobile apps in the field of oncology.

Methods: We developed and conducted an online survey with 24 questions evaluating HCPs' general attitude toward telemedicine and patients using medical mobile apps. Specific questions on the possible functionality for patients and the resulting advantages and disadvantages for both the patients' and HCPs' daily clinical routine were evaluated.

Results: A total of 108 HCPs completed the survey. In all, 88.9% (96/108) considered telemedicine useful and 84.3% (91/108) supported the idea of an oncological app complementing classical treatment. Automatic reminders, timetables, and assessment of side effects and quality of life during therapy were rated as the most important functions. In contrast, uncertainty regarding medical responsibility and data privacy were reasons mostly named by critics. Most (64.8%, 70/108) were in favor of an alert function due to data input needing further clarification, and 94% (66/70) were willing to contact the patient after a critical alert. In all, 93.5% (101/108) supported the idea of using the collected data for scientific research. Moreover, 75.0% (81/108) believed establishing a mobile app could be beneficial for the providing hospital.

Conclusions: A majority of HCPs are in favor of telemedicine and the use of oncological apps by patients. Assessing side effects can lead to quicker response and thus lower inconvenience for patients. Clinical data, such as life quality and treatment satisfaction, could be used to evaluate and improve the therapy workflow. Eventually, a mobile app would enhance the patients' relationship to their treating department because they are in permanent contact.

Keywords: app; eHealth; mHealth; mobile application; oncology; patient-reported outcome; smartphone; telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram showing health care providers’ opinion on possible functions for oncological apps (n=91).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Diagram showing health care providers’ reasons to reject the use of oncological apps (n=17).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Diagram showing a schematic pseudonymous data transfer to a server at the clinic via a secure line.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. eMarketer [2016-07-25]. 2 Billion Consumers Worldwide to Get Smart(phones) by 2016. 2014 Dec 11. http://www.emarketer.com/Article/2-Billion-Consumers-Worldwide-Smartphon... .
    1. Maurer U, Vogelzang M. [2016-07-25]. Android Statistics. AppBrain. 2016. http://www.appbrain.com/stats .
    1. Jordan J. [2016-07-25]. App Store Metrics. PocketGamer. 2016. http://www.pocketgamer.biz/metrics/app-store/
    1. de la Vega Rocío. Miró J. mHealth: a strategic field without a solid scientific soul. a systematic review of pain-related apps. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e101312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101312. http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101312 PONE-D-14-09323 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brzan PP, Rotman E, Pajnkihar M, Klanjsek P. Mobile Applications for Control and Self Management of Diabetes: A Systematic Review. J Med Syst. 2016 Sep;40(9):210. doi: 10.1007/s10916-016-0564-8.10.1007/s10916-016-0564-8 - DOI - PubMed