Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Nov 24;6(11):e013059.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013059.

Are differences in travel time or distance to healthcare for adults in global north countries associated with an impact on health outcomes? A systematic review

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Are differences in travel time or distance to healthcare for adults in global north countries associated with an impact on health outcomes? A systematic review

Charlotte Kelly et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate whether there is an association between differences in travel time/travel distance to healthcare services and patients' health outcomes and assimilate the methodologies used to measure this.

Design: Systematic Review. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Transport database, HMIC and EBM Reviews for studies up to 7 September 2016. Studies were excluded that included children (including maternity), emergency medical travel or countries classed as being in the global south.

Settings: A wide range of settings within primary and secondary care (these were not restricted in the search).

Results: 108 studies met the inclusion criteria. The results were mixed. 77% of the included studies identified evidence of a distance decay association, whereby patients living further away from healthcare facilities they needed to attend had worse health outcomes (eg, survival rates, length of stay in hospital and non-attendance at follow-up) than those who lived closer. 6 of the studies identified the reverse (a distance bias effect) whereby patients living at a greater distance had better health outcomes. The remaining 19 studies found no relationship. There was a large variation in the data available to the studies on the patients' geographical locations and the healthcare facilities attended, and the methods used to calculate travel times and distances were not consistent across studies.

Conclusions: The review observed that a relationship between travelling further and having worse health outcomes cannot be ruled out and should be considered within the healthcare services location debate.

Keywords: Access to Healthcare; Health Outcomes; Systematic Review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of papers.

Comment in

References

    1. Woo Y, Kyrgiou M, Bryant A et al. . Centralisation of care may prolong survival in women with ovarian cancer and possibly more generally gynecological cancer. Secondary centralisation of care may prolong survival in women with ovarian cancer and possibly more generally gynecological cancer 2012. http://summaries.cochrane.oorg/CD007945/centralisation-of-care-may-prolo...
    1. Morris S, Hunter RM, Ramsay AIG et al. . Impact of centralising acute stroke services in English metropolitan areas on mortality and length of hospital stay: difference-in-differences analysis. BMJ 2014;349:g4757 10.1136/bmj.g4757 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haynes R. Geographical access to healthcare. In: Guilliford M, Morgain M, eds. Access to healthcare. London: Routledge, 2003:13–35.
    1. Goddard M, Smith P. Equity of access to healthcare. York: Centre for Health Economics, 1998. Secondary equity of access to healthcare. https://www.york.ac.uk/che/pdf/op32.pdf
    1. Hunter JM, Shannon GW. Jarvis revisited: distance decay in service areas of mid-19th century asylums. Prof Geogr 1985;37:296–302. 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1985.00296.x - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms