Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016:2016:4732153.
doi: 10.1155/2016/4732153. Epub 2016 Nov 3.

Surgical Removal of an Extrauterine Device Migrating to Appendix

Affiliations

Surgical Removal of an Extrauterine Device Migrating to Appendix

Gulsum Uysal et al. Case Rep Med. 2016.

Abstract

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) remain highly effective reversible family planning methods in developing countries. We aimed to report one of the complications of extrauterine and intrauterine devices. A 44-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital with mislocated intrauterine device and abnormal uterine bleeding. Extrauterine IUD device was proven by ultrasound and X-ray. She had normal blood test count with a negative pregnancy test. There are several cases of complications with intrauterine devices, but this is the first case report about an extrauterine IUD embedded by inflame enlarged appendix presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding. Although intrauterine devices are a common safe method for contraception, there is no risk-free insertion even with advanced ultrasounds. A regular self-examination should be taught to the patients and ultrasonography should be performed in the follow-up of the patients especially for inserted devices during lactation period. Extrauterine IUDs can be successfully removed by laparotomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Abdomen X-ray of the patient. Copper T device was in the upper right side of the pelvis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
IUD was partly buried in right adnexa and was embedded by inflame enlarged appendix.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Caliskan E., Öztürk N., Dilbaz B. Ö., Dilbaz S. Analysis of risk factors associated with uterine perforation by intrauterine devices. European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care. 2003;8(3):150–155. doi: 10.1080/ejc.8.3.150.155. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zakin D., Stern W. Z., Rosenblatt R. Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey. 1981;36(7):335–353. doi: 10.1097/00006254-198107000-00001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kaislasuo J., Suhonen S., Gissler M., Lähteenmäki P., Heikinheimo O. Uterine perforation caused by intrauterine devices: clinical course and treatment. Human Reproduction. 2013;28(6):1546–1551. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det074. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Key T. C., Kreutner A. K. Gastrointestinal complications of modern intrauterine devices. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1980;55(2):239–243. - PubMed
    1. Demirci D., Ekmekcioglu O., Demirtas A., Gulmez I. Big bladder stones around an intravesical migrated intrauterine device. International Urology and Nephrology. 2003;35(4):495–496. doi: 10.1023/b:urol.0000025624.15799.8d. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources